From: anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi   
      
   ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) writes:   
      
   > Anssi Saari  wrote:   
   >> "Carlos E.R."  writes:   
   >   
   >> > exFAT is better, but few TV sets support it, while many support NTFS.   
   >   
   >> So how is exFAT better then? As a portable FS?   
   >   
   > exFAT can handle bigger files and partitions. FAT32 can't. See   
   > https://duckduckgo.com/?q=exfat+vs.+fat32 for the details. Also, exFAT   
   > is better for portabilities.   
      
   Wow, way to go off on a weird tangent. I specifically wanted Carlos to   
   explain why he thinks exFAT is better than NTFS for portability since he   
   seemed to contradict himself, saying, as he did, that "few TV sets   
   support it".   
      
   Carlos' answer was, apparently, "yes".   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)