Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux    |    Getting to be as bloated as Windows!    |    107,822 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 107,381 of 107,822    |
|    Paul to bad sector    |
|    Re: Asus x870e Proart Creator motherboar    |
|    13 Jul 25 01:58:02    |
      From: nospam@needed.invalid              On Sat, 7/12/2025 8:46 PM, bad sector wrote:              >       > I never touched the CPU, the next boot failed after I edited the BIOS and       among a few other things disabled the CPU-native graphics.       >       > Then following your advice I managed to reboot into BIOS, ultimately able to       launch an OS. I ha it made using 1/2 of my memory!       >       > J. O. Aho suggested and I prepped a BIOS upgrade usb drive (there are 3       different BIOS sections in the manual, all of them full of mistakes).       >       > As I pressed the bios flash button the LED never illuminated so after about       6 seconds I let it go.       >       > Now I cannot get past the yellow (ram) LED no matter what ddr5 I set in no       matter what ram slot.       >              Hmmm.              Restore non-ECC DIMM in the "best working socket" your previous testing       revealed.              You are likely going to need to flash the BIOS back to some       previous version, at a guess.              On some systems, switching off the power three times, when the machine       is in trouble, initiates "load setup defaults" so you (in theory) can       get back in control of the machine.              *******              The purpose of a non-bricking BIOS design, is to never erase the bootstrap       section.              Then, one of the BIOS flashing options, should always have an interpreter       ready to       read the USB stick and FAT file system, find the named file, and flash it in.              I don't know if that BIOS flashing code has been written to work with       only CPU registers (so a non-working memory is not a problem). Some of the BIOs       code must operate that way, in order so the BIOS code can commission the DRAM       subsystem.              On my ten year old machine, the flasher is a chip connected right to the USB       port.              On my three year old machine, the CPU and RAM must be working, for a flash       operation       to move forward. Which means, even if AGESA isn't optimal, there is some code       present that can do a flash, but a lot more things can still go wrong. It is       definitely not as foolproof as a flasher-chip type solution.              When a "machine has a button", we don't really know how that works. and while       you       would hope a flasher-chip, if it existed, would be physically placed near the       USB stack that supports flashing, the board layout could be such the chip is       just about anywhere. But usually the layout done by humans, the chip is closer       to where it is being used, rather than being routed across from the other side       of the board.              We don't know, if the flasher button terminates in a GPIO signal on the SOC       portion       of the CPU, or whether it terminates on a flasher-chip. I guess that is part       of the       fun. Even when you have a flasher-chip, the board *still* has firmware or       software       based flashing options, in addition to the "unbrickable" USB flasher chip.              *******              You may be at the point, you're going to need to take this in somewhere, and       see if a techie can flash it back to something that works. You *used* to be       able to flash a BIOS backwards, but it took some standalone flasher and an       MSDOS boot media, to "free-form flash", meaning a version check was not       done on purpose, and you could move backwards. We stopped using such flashers,       more than ten years ago, which is why I'm kinda wondering what options       are available for going back to an older version.              At a minimum, what is supposed to happen, is a model number string in the       BIOS image is checked, so you can't flash in the BIOS from some other board.       The version is a separate issue. The only interface you may have, is a       single LED, where the "blink frequency" is all that tells you whether       the flash is ongoing, or, the blinking represents a failure on the       users part, to pass all the model and version number requirements. A single       LED has a definite lack of expressive power.              The behavior of the machine I'm typing this on, changed after a year. The       machine seemed to develop an address map problem. Shutting off the iGPU and       using an NVidia video card, was part of the solution. My first hint of       (some sort of) trouble, was the RealTek Ethernet chip would stop       sending/receiving       packets after 30 seconds. At first I thought I had a DNS problem, but no, the       chip       just stopped after 30 seconds (looked driver-related). I purchased a       replacement       Intel NIC (possibly a Startech), and shut off the RealTek in the BIOS. And       after       that, I was "back in control" after a fashion, but this is only a superficial       fix,       and whatever is wrong in there, still seems to be wrong. And in my case,       flashing up (a couple times to date), made absolutely no difference to the       symptom set. It wasn't like an older BIOS was "bugged" and a newer one made       a difference.              But at this point, until things stabilize in your computer room, you'll be       working with the non-ECC DRAM in its "best" socket. While you try to       re-gain a stable BIOS behavior.               Paul              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca