Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux    |    Getting to be as bloated as Windows!    |    107,822 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 107,580 of 107,822    |
|    Paul to bad sector    |
|    Re: wifi headphones    |
|    12 Oct 25 16:19:33    |
      From: nospam@needed.invalid              On Sun, 10/12/2025 9:44 AM, bad sector wrote:       >       > Has anyone here used BOTH high-end Sennheiser wifi headphones and other       makes of the same 'level'? Any wisdom or comparisons?       >       > I'm impressed by and VERY happy with both of my 3-4 year old Sennheisers,       also having once benefitted from several exchanges with one of their former       chief sound engineers. BUT there is one rub: the cheap counts won't pay for       dedicated frequencies (or        whaaaaatever excuse) so that my wifi router is continuously stepping on the       headphone. There *is* a trick to work around this by starting the headphones       first and then the wifi but I'm just plain fed up with the hassle!       >       > TIA              I would set up one of my Wifi adapters on the computer as       a hotspot for WIDI, in the hopes that would give the       communications some priority. But the airwaves are shared,       and you cannot really "hog" 2.4Ghz and keep it all to yourself.              And the headphones may not have a selector for 2.4Ghz or 5Ghz.              If you want "best performance", a simple copper wire gives       real time performance :-)              There might be a QOS feature for the Wifi router.       QOS is Quality Of Service, which is a means of assigning       a higher priority to a communication.               Paul              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca