Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux    |    Getting to be as bloated as Windows!    |    107,822 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 107,595 of 107,822    |
|    Paul to bad sector    |
|    Re: wifi headphones    |
|    21 Oct 25 23:15:56    |
      From: nospam@needed.invalid              On Tue, 10/21/2025 9:02 AM, bad sector wrote:       > On 10/13/25 2:02 PM, Paul wrote:       >> On Mon, 10/13/2025 9:39 AM, bad sector wrote:       >>       >>> Paul does have a way of talking down to 'quarters where the ragged people       go' to quote Simon and Garafunkel. It's as if you were in a biology-101 class       and having asked a pedestrian question the prof would look up from his notes       and say:       >>>       >>> "Have you ever heard about the theory of natuaral selection or am I a       harsh judge of character?"* :-)       >>>       >>> Mind you I should have thought of the 2.4/5ghz split that he raised       because my router does have both so maybe the answer lies in splitting those       on a per service basis? No, not for me, I want less involvement not more; I       may have to just settle for        something from Bose with wires on it.       >>>       >>>       >>> * an actual quote from my theology prof in a class of 400 students packed       in like sardines and sitting on the hardwood floor of a gymn.       >>>       >>>       >>       >> Well, I never know to what extent a term is "popular", and I've seen       >> references to WiDi when the topic of "what replaces Miracast" come up.       >>       >> If I had said Wifi Direct, maybe people would assume this was       >> a company on the Internet that sold Wifi stuff :-)       >>       >> I'm the only person who uses this stuff, obviously.       >> (No Wifi router, but I have Wifi adapters).       >>       >> Paul       >       > post didn't make it out the last time       >       > I asked chatgpt and in the case of a wifi printer, if I read correctly, I       still need to connect to the printer's WFFD network created to allow       connection without a router.       >       > https://chatgpt.com/c/68f61f55-d124-8329-860b-90f31d78d1a7       >       > This means I cannot print while connected to my sphone hot-spot for example.       So I need to explore how a *dual or triple WAN* router would handle such an       assignment.       >       > At present I'm accessing the net via 3 connections:       >       > 1 - my sphone hot-spot       > 2 - a community radio network fed by a badwidth wholesaler       > 3 - just signed up to starlink (axed cable to pay for it)       >       > The sphone hotspot is a backup but I might also use it with either the       laptop or the desktop when the other box is maxing out one of the other two       connections.       >       > The community radio network will in the near future include TV and is most       > likely there to stay (except that it's a small and fragile outfit without the       > backbones of a big-league provider).              There is an example of a Wifi Direct setup of an HP Printer here. It seems to       use Wifi Direct and a WPS password or something.               https://support.hp.com/hk-en/document/ish_1841315-1637332-16              The instructions for these things, don't seem to dwell on the technical       details of nameserving, so that operation on a different OS, you can       compensate for any slight differences.              *******              The Starlink comes with its own router, but the router is pretty basic       and some people replace it with their own router.              While I can see one TPLink with three or four WAN ports of capability, the       Internet       is awash with mis-information and mis-labeled info pages. The thing is       likely to be able to do fail-over with two WANs, but one reporter says it       takes a minute or so to detect the primary WAN has dropped and then it       uses the secondary WAN. It can apparently also load balance       (likely using "metrics" like Linux or Windows might use, to set       the priority for how many connections or what amount of traffic       goes on each WAN). But because the device is a managed router,       and the easy control of the router is via a Cloud website, this       is hardly what we all pine for in networking equipment. I want       a router that sits in my home, and is purely controlled in my       home, and I "can't log into it from the WAN side, not evar".              This is perhaps, too much of a research topic for me, to pick       a good solution.              *******              How I might arrange this, is I would               1 - my sphone hot-spot <===       emergency direct connect to PC/PC port               2 - a community radio network fed by a bandwidth wholesaler \___ 2-WAN       failover or load balancer box        3 - just signed up to starlink (axed cable to pay for it) /              That might reduce the complexity of the thing.               Paul              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca