Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux    |    Getting to be as bloated as Windows!    |    107,822 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 107,794 of 107,822    |
|    Paul to Carlos E. R.    |
|    Re: PSA: Clipboard differences between C    |
|    15 Feb 26 07:54:11    |
      XPost: alt.comp.software.firefox, comp.sys.mac.system       From: nospam@needed.invalid              On Sun, 2/15/2026 7:13 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:       > On 2026-02-15 07:52, Maria Sophia wrote:       >> Carlos E. R. wrote:       >>> I don't have Chromium, I have Chrome.       >>       >> Hi Carlos,       >> Just to be clear, as far as anyone has stated, any chromium-based browser       >> and any mozilla-based browser should show the respective attributes of this       >> PSA that Lawrence D'Oliveiro & you were testing for the team on Linux.       >> Lawrence kindly published his results in this post for others to benefit.       >       > I saw that.       >       > ...       >       >> I may be wrong but it seems that Lawrence's tests show that even terminals       >> may include HTML depending on the environment.       >       > Certainly. There is variance on how they do it. For example, on XFCE       terminal, you have to select menu "Edit / Copy, or copy as html". Editors make       use of this to render the color used in the terminal.       >       >> A. Emacs offers only plain text formats.       >> B. Firefox offers HTML only when it thinks the selection has structure.       >> C. Chromium always offers HTML plus internal formats.       >> His tests showed different applications expose different sets of formats.       >>       >> The editor decides which format to use when pasting.       >> This matches the PSA exactly.       >>       >> Do you think you might be able to reproduce his tests on your Linux box?       >       > I already tested and found no bug. I don't see what else you want to find       out.       >       > I can not run his command, anyway:       >       > cer@Laicolasse:~> wl-paste       > Failed to connect to a Wayland server       > cer@Laicolasse:~> wl-paste --help       > Usage:       > wl-paste [options]       > Paste content from the Wayland clipboard. <===========       >       > Options:       > -n, --no-newline Do not append a newline character.       > -l, --list-types Instead of pasting, list the offered types.       > -p, --primary Use the "primary" clipboard.       > -w, --watch command Run a command each time the selection       changes.       > -t, --type mime/type Override the inferred MIME type for the       content.       > -s, --seat seat-name Pick the seat to work with.       > -v, --version Display version info.       > -h, --help Display this message.       > Mandatory arguments to long options are mandatory for short options too.       >       > See wl-clipboard(1) for more details.       > cer@Laicolasse:~>       >       > I use X, not wayland.              There's no guarantee any clipboards softwares will       even agree on what is on the clipboard. Some of the       clipboard items could be automatic translations of       things submitted by the sourcing application. And       Wayland being a latecomer, of course it's going to have       to do weird shit, to get a name for itself.              Firefox supports all three serving options, as would a Chromium.               Wayland, Xwayland (temporary X11 option for older programs), Xorg (original       X11 still available)              A person doing testing, has to find two clipboard managers (Wayland one, X11       one), have three login options,       to do some tests. And even then, who knows whether the answer is based on       hard reasons underneath.               Paul              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca