Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.windows95    |    Thought this was overrated, OS/2 rocked    |    679 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 503 of 679    |
|    Andrew DeFaria to Christopher Jahn    |
|    Re: Mozilla on Windows 95?    |
|    06 Feb 05 00:08:20    |
   
   XPost: alt.windows95, netscape.public.mozilla.general   
   From: Andrew@DeFaria.com   
      
   Christopher Jahn wrote:   
      
   > Andrew DeFaria wrote in   
   > news:cu4ds0$p8m1@ripley.netscape.com:   
   >   
   >> Chaos Master wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> This is Andrew DeFaria for forever:   
   >>>   
   >>> [Mozilla on Windows 95]   
   >>>   
   >>>> But Windows 95 is even older! What's that like 10 years old now?   
   >>>   
   >>> IE 5.5 has security flaws... Windows 95 doesn't have big flaws,   
   >>> AFAIK. This is the reason that made me move to Mozilla.   
   >>   
   >> Huh? Windows 95 has no security - FAT has no security. Windows 95 is   
   >> not multiuser. To me those are big flaws.   
   >   
   > Who asked you?   
      
   I didn't realize that being asked was a requirement for voicing your   
   opinion. Lord knows it's never stopped you!   
      
   > And frankly, the fact that Win95 wasn't multiuser was an advantage.   
      
   And who asked you? ;-)   
   --   
   I went to a restaurant that serves "breakfast at any time". So I ordered   
   French Toast during the Renaissance.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca