Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.windows95    |    Thought this was overrated, OS/2 rocked    |    679 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 504 of 679    |
|    scratch to Andrew DeFaria    |
|    Re: Mozilla on Windows 95?    |
|    06 Feb 05 09:49:40    |
      XPost: alt.windows95, netscape.public.mozilla.general       From: scratch@the-pentagon.com              Andrew DeFaria wrote:       > Chaos Master wrote:       >       >> This is Andrew DeFaria for forever:       >>       >> [Mozilla on Windows 95]       >>       >>> But Windows 95 is even older! What's that like 10 years old now?       >>       >> IE 5.5 has security flaws... Windows 95 doesn't have big flaws, AFAIK.       >> This is the reason that made me move to Mozilla.       >       > Huh? Windows 95 has no security - FAT has no security. Windows 95 is not       > multiuser. To me those are big flaws.              no security, eh? explain the discrepancy in the number of holes that       have been found in XP vs. those that have been found in 95 when, as you       point out, the latter is twice as old. and XP's home edition has the       security stripped out of NTFS.              -scratch              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca