XPost: microsoft.public.win95.general.discussion, alt.windows95   
      
   On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 23:34:10 +0100, Shep©  wrote:   
      
   >On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 05:10:53 GMT If I have seen farther it is because   
   >I have stood on the shoulder of giants  MikeJones@nomail.edu wrote :   
   >   
   >>I was using version 6, recommended by people here. They stopped making new   
   virus   
   >>definitions for version 6 and require version 7 to get updated virus lists.   
   I tried Google   
   >>Groups and found little discussion, one post, about the new version and  it   
   wasn't   
   >>positive.   
   >>   
   >>Are people using it. Does it wreck your computer? Does it work?   
   >>   
   >>There was an ominous message at the grisoft site about the System Failure   
   problem being   
   >>fixed. ;-) I'm always cautious about installing new software because you   
   don't really know   
   >>what it's going to do especially on Windows 95 which few people still use.   
   >>   
   >>I'm using Windows 95b on a Dell Dimension 300 MHz Pentium 2.   
   >>   
   >>Thank you.   
   >   
   >Used it for years on all O/S but it became too popular(probably partly   
   >my fault :)   
   >Moved on to FreeAv,   
   >http://www.free-av.com/   
   >Superb.Small memory footprint.Excellent updates and a forum to join   
   >for free if you have deeper problems :)   
      
   Thanks. I think I saw people were using it when I did a Google Groups search.   
   I just checked their website and it doesn't look like Windows 95 is supported.   
   The top of their main page says:   
      
   AntiVir® PersonalEdition Classic   
   for Windows 98/Me and XP (XP&2000&NT)   
   Linux/OpenBSD/FreeBSD/Solaris   
      
   I don't see a FAQ or anything about system requirements.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)