home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.os.windows95      Thought this was overrated, OS/2 rocked      679 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 560 of 679   
   DaveJohnson12@nomail. to All   
   Re: Are monitor drivers necessary? Buyin   
   07 May 05 06:11:17   
   
   XPost: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell, microsoft.public.win95.general.discussion,   
   alt.windows95   
   XPost: alt.sys.pc-clone.compaq   
      
   On Fri, 6 May 2005 22:59:52 -0500, "NuTCrAcKeR"    
   wrote:   
      
   >windows 95 is no longer necessary   
      
   In a general sense I agree. :-)  I'm not sure what you mean though.   
   Anyway I've found out that the drivers aren't needed for a CRT but for an LCD   
   they may be   
   required.   
      
      
   >   
   >   
   > wrote in message   
   >news:mpei71thmm2tmvbk90o10so0r6uns091er@4ax.com...   
   >> I'm using Windows 95b. I'm planning to buy a new CRT, maybe an HP-mx705.   
   >> The   
   >> computer is a Dell PII 300 MHz Dimension.   
   >>   
   >> The HP monitor has drivers for Windows 98 and above only. Is this going to   
   >> be a   
   >> problem? What is the purpose of the monitor drivers? Do I really need   
   >> them?   
   >>   
   >> I never installed monitor drivers for my current monitor, an Iiyama CRT   
   >> (MT901E)   
   >> so I'm thinking either they aren't needed or the monitor drivers came with   
   >> Windows 95 so I didn't have to install them from a disc.   
   >>   
   >> Thanks.   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca