XPost: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell, microsoft.public.win95.general.discussion,   
   alt.windows95   
      
   On Sat, 07 May 2005 11:04:05 -0700, Ghostrider <-00-@fitron.142> wrote:   
      
   >   
   >   
   >DaveJohnson12@nomail. wrote:   
   >> On Sat, 07 May 2005 01:59:00 GMT, ben_myers_spam_me_not @ charter.net (Ben   
   Myers) wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>Honestly, I would not buy any computer or monitor with the HP brand name on   
   it.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Me neither but it was the best CRT I could find in a store. There's very   
   little selection.   
   >   
   >   
   >In a store and not bundled with a system, the more common   
   >monitor brands such as ViewSonic, NEC, etc., should ranked   
   >significantly better than HP. Of course, one thing to always   
   >do with monitors is to test their suitability not under store   
   >lighting but in the actual work environment. And if the store   
   >does not carry name-brand monitors, find the stores that do.   
      
   Finding them is the hard part. I've seen Viewsonics and NECs that were not at   
   all good.   
   The Viewsonic that the chains (CompUSA and PC Richard) are selling now is not   
   a good   
   monitor, blurry text and colors don't look right. I've seen NECs with blurry   
   text, brand   
   new. Thanks.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)