XPost: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell, microsoft.public.win95.general.discussion,   
   alt.windows95   
   From: ZXRacer@TheTrack.com   
      
    wrote in message   
   news:9cuq719u16etib03n50rrbjogoprgi5jj3@4ax.com...   
   > On Sat, 07 May 2005 11:04:05 -0700, Ghostrider <-00-@fitron.142> wrote:   
   >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >DaveJohnson12@nomail. wrote:   
   > >> On Sat, 07 May 2005 01:59:00 GMT, ben_myers_spam_me_not @ charter.net   
   (Ben Myers) wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >>   
   > >>>Honestly, I would not buy any computer or monitor with the HP brand   
   name on it.   
   > >>   
   > >>   
   > >> Me neither but it was the best CRT I could find in a store. There's   
   very little selection.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >In a store and not bundled with a system, the more common   
   > >monitor brands such as ViewSonic, NEC, etc., should ranked   
   > >significantly better than HP. Of course, one thing to always   
   > >do with monitors is to test their suitability not under store   
   > >lighting but in the actual work environment. And if the store   
   > >does not carry name-brand monitors, find the stores that do.   
   >   
   > Finding them is the hard part. I've seen Viewsonics and NECs that were not   
   at all good.   
   > The Viewsonic that the chains (CompUSA and PC Richard) are selling now is   
   not a good   
   > monitor, blurry text and colors don't look right. I've seen NECs with   
   blurry text, brand   
   > new. Thanks.   
      
   Seriously, when was the last time you had your eyes checked?!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)