XPost: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell, microsoft.public.win95.general.discussion,   
   alt.windows95   
   XPost: alt.sys.pc-clone.compaq   
      
   On Wed, 11 May 2005 22:42:55 -0400, "Ted Zieglar"  wrote:   
      
   >Ah, a trip down memory lane...95c was also known as OSR 2.1. It was a minor   
   >upgrade to 95b and was available only to OEMs. No new features added, just a   
   >technical upgrade. I believe it supported certain hardware that was   
   >previously unsupported, but you can look it up on the web if you're   
   >interested in the details.   
      
   Thanks, it's not that important. I was just curious.   
      
   >   
   >Ted Zieglar   
   >   
   > wrote in message   
   >news:u6g5819ibb5ns6dr4olfgoa9ucf181rflm@4ax.com...   
   >> On Thu, 12 May 2005 00:23:27 +0200, "Pixel  \"#~"    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>Earlier Tim Slattery muttered:   
   >>>   
   >>>>>Well, whatever the original Windows 95 was called, it was released well   
   >>>>>before   
   >>>>>its time.  If Windows 95A with SP1 included FAT32 support, at least it   
   >>>>>was a   
   >>>>>step forward.  If not, I have to put it in the same garbage pail as the   
   >>>>>original   
   >>>>>Windows 95... Ben Myers   
   >>>>   
   >>>>It didn't. FAT32 debuted with OEM SR2 (Win95b). That was an OEM   
   >>>>release only, there was no (official) way to upgrade an original Win95   
   >>>>or Win95a system to Win95b. Various people - Sean Erwin comes to mind   
   >>>>- posted workarounds to that.   
   >>>   
   >>>Speaking of which, what's this Win95c I sometimes here about?   
   >>   
   >> I was wondering too. I never heard of that one.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)