c212cc30   
   XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.os.linux, microsoft.public.wi   
   dows.vista.general   
   XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-xp   
   From: ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com   
      
   On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:20:35 -0600, Rex Ballard    
   wrote:   
      
   > Commercial versions of SUSE are better tested and more reliable, and   
   > are more likely to configure correctly.  When I installed SUSE 10   
   > commercial version, it figured out which binary-only graphics   
   > accelerator driver to use, installed it and configured it correctly,   
   > and ran beautifully.   
      
   I've got SUSE 10 SP 2 running on the other computer (a twin to the GX240).   
   It set up my monitor's resolution up to 120 instead of the 85 (the norm   
   for openSUSE). I didnt know if that was what I really wanted, but it   
   obviously did something different. It also came built in with an MP3   
   player and nicer fonts -- but the choice of software in its repositories   
   is more limited. For what I need, openSUSE works great. But if folks want   
   technical support and are willing to pay the very reasonable rate of $120   
   for 3 years support, I'd go with SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop.   
      
   --   
   RonB   
   "There's a story there...somewhere"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)