From: anon@no.email   
      
   "JimH", thou deceiving shallow jester. Thou cruel, ingrateful, savage and   
   inhuman creature. Ye puffed:   
      
   > "chrisv"  wrote in news:hn6f68$umf$1   
   > @tornado.tornevall.net:   
   >   
   >   
   >> "JimH"  wrote in message   
   >> news:Xns9D363F463FD8Ahahadotdotdot@74.209.136.99...   
   >>> "Auric__"  wrote in   
   >>> news:Xns9D335590D5E91auricauricauricauric@69.16.185.250:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 07:39:11 GMT, Dave wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Mar 5, 7:39 pm, "Auric__"  wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:13:58 GMT, Dave wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> [snip]   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Learn what crossposting is.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I will when you learn the definition of etiquette, my friend.   
   >>>>> Cheers.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It is *you* who needs to learn etiquette. You have done something   
   >>>> which is a breach of "netiquette" -- multiposting (posting similar or   
   >>>> identical messages to multiple groups, one at a time). What you   
   >>>> should have done is crossposted the message (post one message to   
   >>>> multiple groups at once).   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It's a very simple thing to do: when you post, simply type in more   
   >>>> than one group name in the "newgroups" field of your newsreader.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>> In theory, Auric, that's great. The problem is that there are people   
   > like   
   >>> myself who filter out messages that are posted to more than one group.   
   >>   
   >> Then if you don't see an answer, tough shite.   
   >>   
   >>   
   > If you can't decide what you want to talk about and pick an approriate   
   > NG to post it in, I'm not interested in hearing what you have to say   
   > anyway.   
      
   seems to me you need to be bitchslapped to kingdom come and back again.   
      
   --   
   I have defined no god. And when I do need to define some god for the   
   purposes of discussing its nature with atheists I always define the   
   supposed some god in the very same concrete and arbitrary terms, without   
   variation:   
      
   God = Metaphysical X   
      
   Watching you idiot atheists witlessly pinning your own lunatic   
   assumptions and irrational perceptions onto it then attempting to argue   
   against your very own deranged Frankenstein-like creation with utterly   
   b0rked illogic is a never-ending source of great hilarity.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)