Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.windows.xp    |    Another Windows XP fan forum    |    2,222 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 395 of 2,222    |
|    TyBreaker to Rod.Speed@gmail.com    |
|    Re: Internet time    |
|    17 Apr 06 21:29:08    |
      XPost: alt.os.windows-xp, aus.computers, microsoft.public.windowsxp.general       From: tybreakerNO@SPAMhotmail.com              Rod.Speed@gmail.com wrote:              > Yes. I'll do some more tests tomorrow to see whether the problem       > is just the difference between the system time and the internet time       > that sees the update ignored. In other words if the amount of time       > update is greater than a particular amount of time, it bins the net time.       >       > I know that it does that when the system time is days       > wrong, but in that case it does say that the synch has failed       > and its hard to see why it would do that with just 5 mins.              That rings a bell, NTP has a threshold margin. If within the threshold,       it will slow down/speed up the clock until synch is achieved but if       outside the threshold, it can simply fail but it does depend on how NTP       is implemented from O/S to O/S.              --        ______ ___ __       /_ __/_ __/ _ )_______ ___ _/ /_____ ____        / / / // / _ / __/ -_) _ `/ '_/ -_) __/       /_/ \_, /____/_/ \__/\_,_/_/\_\\__/_/        /___/              There are 10 types of people in this world; those who understand the       binary numbering system and those who don't.              There's no place like 127.0.0.1.              ASCII a silly question, get a silly ANSI.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca