Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.windows-xp    |    One of my personal favourites!    |    146,966 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 145,177 of 146,966    |
|    Peter to All    |
|    Re: Wireless problem with Windows XP Hom    |
|    01 Jun 10 17:44:33    |
      From: pete.ivesAll_stRESS@blueyonder.co.uk              In article <3vmdnfkxQ86LtpjRnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@mchsi.com>,       grinder@no.spam.maam.com says...       > On 6/1/2010 10:36 AM, Marti van Lin wrote:       > > Hi Windows XP Experts,       > >       > > I have a question about Windows XP and Wireless networking.       > >       > > Here is the situation:       > >       > > I am currently running Windows XP Home on my Acer Aspire 7220, which       > > originally shipped with Windows Vista Home Basic. Which IMHO was a pig.       > > Out of frustration I installed several GNU/Linux distributions (mostly       > > kept up with the latest Ubuntu release) which ran fine.       > >       > > My family stays in touch using Skype, yet unfortunately the GNU/Linux       > > version of Skype is a POS. My family can see and hear me, but I can't       > > see them.       > >       > > So I replaced Ubuntu 10.04 with Microsoft Windows XP Home and after       > > updates and SP3, Wireless Networking, using WPA2 finally works, but       > > don't ask how.       > >       > > My (secondary) Sitecom Wireless router is connected to a (primary)       > > Emminent router. Under GNU/Linux I could simply use the (secondary)       > > wireless router as a access point (the CAT5 UTP cable from the (primary)       > > Emminent router was simply connected to a random LAN port, which ran       > > fine under GNU/Linux). Under Windows XP I have to connect the CAT5 UTP       > > cable from the (primary) Emminent router to the WAN port of the       > > (secondary) Sitecom Wireless router. Otherwise Windows XP doesn't pick       > > up the Wireless signal at all.       > >       > > I wonder what I've done wrong.       >       > I can't tell what's wrong with your scenario, but I can report that I       > have a similar configuration that works well with several flavors of       > Windows, including XP Home. A wired linksys router has its WAN port       > connected to a cable modem, and one of it's LAN ports connected to the       > LAN port on a wireless Linksys router. In fact, I've done this setup       > several times with different brands of hardware and not had any problem.       >       > Moreover, it seems odd to me that your routers would in any way be       > affected by your choice of operating system. Maybe you have       > mal-configured your routers coincident with this OS change, or have some       > bad drivers on the XP side.       >              I have 4 or 5 computers using various incarnations of Windows connect to       a similar setup (though slightly reversed). Main cable modem goes to       wireless router. 4 port switch is connected to wireless router through       standard lan ports. What I did have to do, if I recall, was to turn off       DHCP on the 4 port switch, which allowed the wireless router to assign       IPs to all devices connected. Before this I had a hell of a problem       getting things working.              Other than that it has no problems with any O/S that I connect to it.              --       Pete Ives       Remove All_stRESS before sending me an email              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca