From: kayzen@free.fr   
      
   "Steve Urbach"  a écrit dans le message de groupe de discussion :   
   qqqji65e6de2ot7n53df53oti372ml1d9u@4ax.com...   
      
   On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 13:41:50 +0100, "Sydney"  wrote:   
      
   >"Steve Urbach"  a écrit dans le message de groupe de discussion :   
   >87bkh6h4pvdmu8364l22u3eghb0d60b6br@4ax.com...   
   >   
   >On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 09:01:38 +0100, "Sydney"  wrote:   
   >   
   >>"Steve Urbach"  a écrit dans le message de groupe de discussion :   
   >>prehh6l3cen14hg0qeq2kducurdjub18jb@4ax.com...   
   >>   
   >>On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 14:03:13 +0100, "Sydney"  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>"Steve Urbach"  a écrit dans le message de groupe de discussion :   
   >>>b6k9h6574a58phoqefq449qoga64rje3mc@4ax.com...   
   >>>   
   >>>On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:50:46 +0100, "Sydney"  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>I have many difficulties to connect to my wifi access point according   
   >>>>where   
   >>>>I am with my netbook.   
   >>>>Sometimes I get the message connected to address "169.254.9.70" instead   
   >>>>of   
   >>>>192.168.0.28;   
   >>>>also it may show limited access to the Internet.   
   >>>>What is this address Type and what is happening.   
   >>>>I have got a local network with fixe IPs;   
   >>>>   
   >>>That first IP is what  you get (default) when DHCP does not assign an   
   >>>address   
   >>>(or it got' lost' on the way), Try a right-click on the network icon :   
   >>>'repair'   
   >>>   
   >>>Thanks a lot. At least this clarifies one point. In the end I could not   
   >>>see   
   >>>my SSID and connected to a public SSID not secured.   
   >>I am confused now:If you connected (to the Public), you should have an IP.   
   >>Or do you mean, the your kit refused to connect because it was configured   
   >>to   
   >>reject 'Un-secure' connections?   
   >>The result you got would be what I expected.   
   >>The connetion to the Public was made after the failed connection to my own   
   >>SSID. *attempted* connection   
   >< NO  usable IP# = No connection in my book ;)   
   >   
   >< machine that would be difficult without a active NIC.   
   >   
   >How do you insert a "loopback plug"  ?   
      
   >you would not want to break your mind.   
      
   >Now re-read my post.   
      
   >I never said you should insert a loopback plug in a WIRELESS connection.   
   >I gave an example. that would produce similar results.. The system   
   >recognizes   
   >that there is a Network present, but there is no CONNECTION.   
      
   Ok . Thank you   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)