Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.windows-xp    |    One of my personal favourites!    |    146,966 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 145,881 of 146,966    |
|    philo to bad sector    |
|    Re: windows partition requirement    |
|    12 Nov 11 06:41:50    |
      From: philo@invalid.not              On 11/11/2011 10:43 PM, bad sector wrote:       > On 11/11/2011 11:12 PM, philo wrote:       >> On 11/11/2011 04:19 PM, Auric__ wrote:       >>> philo wrote:       >>>       >>>> On 11/11/2011 09:04 AM, bad sector wrote:       >>>>>       >>>>> Is there a requirement for the first primary partition for any windows       >>>>> installation (xp or 7)? Can one install linux on the 1st primary and       >>>>> windows on the 2nd?       >>>>>       >>>>> I know that a (any) primary "is" required at least to boot windows.       >>>>       >>>> It's true that the "boot" files for Windows must be on the first       >>>> primary       >>>> partition       >>>>       >>>> the rest of Windows can be on any drive though       >>>       >>> Not necessarily true. I have Windows and its boot files on the 3rd       >>> partition       >>> (hda3) and it works just fine. (hda1 is Linux /boot; hda2 is DOS C:,       >>> marked       >>> active but with no drive letter under Windows.)       >>>       >>> In theory, Windows *should* be able to boot from any partition;       >>> possibly even       >>> from extended partitions and/or drives other than the primary master       >>> (although       >>> I haven't tried).       >>>       >>       >>       >> If you check you will see that your windows boot files are on your first       >> active primary partition ...partition C:       >       > Ok, I think I see where you're coming from. What windows sees as drive C       > is "the" active primary partition. As that can be any one of up to 4       > "it" is always drive C (to windows). There's no first active (primary)       > partition as there can be only one. The "first" primary partition is the       > lowest existing primary partition regardless of whether it's active or       > not. That's what I was asking about :-)       >       >       >       >       >       >       >       >       >       >                     Well, as Auric pointed out there are workarounds       but if you don't know exactly what you are doing...it can be risky              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca