home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.os.windows-xp      One of my personal favourites!      146,966 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 145,881 of 146,966   
   philo to bad sector   
   Re: windows partition requirement   
   12 Nov 11 06:41:50   
   
   From: philo@invalid.not   
      
   On 11/11/2011 10:43 PM, bad sector wrote:   
   > On 11/11/2011 11:12 PM, philo wrote:   
   >> On 11/11/2011 04:19 PM, Auric__ wrote:   
   >>> philo wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 11/11/2011 09:04 AM, bad sector wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Is there a requirement for the first primary partition for any windows   
   >>>>> installation (xp or 7)? Can one install linux on the 1st primary and   
   >>>>> windows on the 2nd?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I know that a (any) primary "is" required at least to boot windows.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It's true that the "boot" files for Windows must be on the first   
   >>>> primary   
   >>>> partition   
   >>>>   
   >>>> the rest of Windows can be on any drive though   
   >>>   
   >>> Not necessarily true. I have Windows and its boot files on the 3rd   
   >>> partition   
   >>> (hda3) and it works just fine. (hda1 is Linux /boot; hda2 is DOS C:,   
   >>> marked   
   >>> active but with no drive letter under Windows.)   
   >>>   
   >>> In theory, Windows *should* be able to boot from any partition;   
   >>> possibly even   
   >>> from extended partitions and/or drives other than the primary master   
   >>> (although   
   >>> I haven't tried).   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> If you check you will see that your windows boot files are on your first   
   >> active primary partition ...partition C:   
   >   
   > Ok, I think I see where you're coming from. What windows sees as drive C   
   > is "the" active primary partition. As that can be any one of up to 4   
   > "it" is always drive C (to windows). There's no first active (primary)   
   > partition as there can be only one. The "first" primary partition is the   
   > lowest existing primary partition regardless of whether it's active or   
   > not. That's what I was asking about :-)   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
      
      
   Well, as Auric pointed out there are workarounds   
   but if you don't know exactly what you are doing...it can be risky   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca