Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.windows-xp    |    One of my personal favourites!    |    146,966 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 146,326 of 146,966    |
|    Greegor to All    |
|    DirectX 9.0c software versus Video HARDW    |
|    03 Jan 13 21:53:39    |
      941fcc20       XPost: alt.windows-xp, microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment,       microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support       XPost: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general       From: greegor47@gmail.com              OK, I'm firmly convinced that for Win XP, DirectX 9.0c is the       latest installable DirectX module.              But I got a casual (easy) game collection CD for the holidays       that is for Windows XP, but requires DIRECTX 9.0       in the video card and didn't like the 9.0c SW module.              I also looked into video cards to possibly upgrade       enough to run W7 or W8 fairly well and noticed       that various video cards have DIRECTX 10 or ? in them.              Apparently this opens the door to having Direct X 10 or 11       on a Windows XP computer.              Why would DIRECTX 9.0 in a vid card work better       than the DirectX 9.0c software module for a game?              Is there a lot of other software that runs on WinXP       but can even use DIRECTX 10 (in video hardware)?              It's not like these are slow computers where       software DirectX runs slow or anything...              Is hardware DIRECTX 10 or 11 fairly common       for on board video in newer mother boards?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca