Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.windows-xp    |    One of my personal favourites!    |    146,966 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 146,539 of 146,966    |
|    VanguardLH to pyotr filipivich    |
|    Re: upgrade from 32 to 64 bit XP - "at t    |
|    12 Jul 13 23:49:16    |
      From: V@nguard.LH              pyotr filipivich wrote:              > Can it be done with just an upgrade, or will I need a clean install       > anyway?              Lots of problems when going to the 64-bit version of Windows XP.       That's because it is actually Windows Server 2003 64-bit skinned to       look like Windows XP along with some crippling of server       functionality. The result is that many apps that won't run under a       server version of Windows will also not run under Win XP 64-bit. Some       programs check if they are ran under a server version and refuse to       load or will deliberately misbehave (because you are violating the TOS       for that software). Some expect a workstation version of Windows and       are coded thusly and don't function properly under a server version.              You better make sure ALL your software, including hardware drivers,       will run in a server version of Windows if you migrate to Win XP       32-bit to Win XP 64-bit.              > I need 64 bit OS for class work.              No, you don't. The only need for 64-bit mode on a workstation is to       allow access to more memory. Yet user-mode programs will still only       access up to 2GB unless specifically coded to access more memory. If       your claim is that you need to use such 64-bit programs then you       should be going to a server version of Windows or a later workstation       version that itself supports 64-bit mode, not a bastardized Windows XP       64-bit version.              > If I can upgrade in place with       > XP, is good. If I need to do a clean install - might as well look       > into upgrading hardware at the same time.              Oh, your "school" requires you to provide the platform on which to run       your homework? This really isn't a school requirement, is it?              > Win 7 seems to be "viable"       > - Win8 seems to have achieved the functionality of AOL, becoming       > system for playing with, not working on.              Win Vista: no (avoid).       Win 7: perhaps depending on what are you real requirements       Win 8 (even 8.1): Give that to your enemies.              > tschus       > pyotr        |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca