Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.windows-xp    |    One of my personal favourites!    |    146,966 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 146,544 of 146,966    |
|    Aragorn to All    |
|    Re: Linux Mint 15 (1/2)    |
|    15 Jul 13 04:26:25    |
      XPost: alt.os.linux.mint, alt.os.linux.ubuntu       From: thorongil@telenet.be.invalid              On Monday 15 July 2013 02:47, Chris F.A. Johnson conveyed the following       to alt.os.linux.mint...              > On 2013-07-14, Auric__ wrote:       >> D?nk 42? wrote:       >>       >>> I never regret switching to Linux, especially now that I know what       >>> Microsoft has been up to! Thanks, Clem!       >>       >> That's nice. I've been using Linux for about 14 years now. I'm stil       >> using Windows. Shrug.       >       > I've been using Linux for almost 14 years.              Likewise.              > Before that I used an Amiga.              Right before I started using GNU/Linux, I was running NT 4.0, which I've       run for about two years. I chose NT because, before that, I had been       running OS/2 for nearly six years, but I needed a new machine, and what       I really wanted was UNIX, which was hard to come by in those days and       which was very expensive for private use.              I did not have an Internet connection yet at the time - nor any other       network connection for that matter - so file transfer was always via       sneakernet, and all my friends were running Windows 95 on their machines       of the time. Coming from OS/2 - which was a real 32-bit operating       system, but its popularity was weaning - I didn't want to settle for       something based on DOS (and especially not on a Pentium II) so I       compromised and chose NT instead. I didn't /completely/ like it, but I       wasn't particularly bothered by it either. It was a standalone machine       anyway, and it was the only computer I owned at the time.              I did however have the experience that software which wasn't explicitly       written with NT support in mind would often throw up errors, and I was       slightly irritated that NT didn't support Ultra-DMA access for my hard       disk. I was even more irritated that I needed to install Service Pack 3       first in order to get NT to recognize my AGP bus, and installing the       proper graphics driver and the proper sound driver was quite annoying as       well, particularly as I had to redo the whole thing after the hard disk       in my computer broke down only a few weeks after I had bought it.              Yet, when I switched to GNU/Linux, I didn't do so because I would be fed       up with NT or anything. I simply wanted to explore GNU/Linux and       immediately found that it was everything I had been looking for in an       operating system. It was a UNIX family system, and the GPL and other       Free Software licenses appealed strongly to me, as did the wealth of       software which was all installed together with the base operating system       in one go, and fully integrated with it.              My first distribution came with StarOffice - the predecessor to what       would later become OpenOffice - and StarOffice didn't have the ability       to produce MS-Office documents yet at the time, but also included in the       distribution was a native GNU/Linux version of WordPerfect 8, and that       was definitely enough for me on account of being able to produce       documents which were compatible with DOS and Windows computers. After       all, my friends weren't making any particular efforts at producing       anything compatible with /my/ software either, even back when I was       still running OS/2, so why would _I_ need to run software which was       explicitly compatible with their systems? WordPerfect was definitely to       my liking, because I had been involved in teaching WordPerfect - the 5.x       versions, for DOS - and even typing up the WordPerfect courses in the       past, so I knew WP pretty well.              I ran a dual-boot installation of GNU/Linux and NT 4.0 for about a       month, during which I found myself booting more into GNU/Linux than into       NT, and when NT then finally refused to boot on January 1st 2000 in       spite of having installed the official Microsoft Y2K Pack and the latest       NT Service Packs, it only sped up my decision that GNU/Linux was the       operating system I was going to stick with.              I was already exclusively running GNU/Linux for four months before I got       a cable Internet connection at home. Prior to that, if I wanted to surf       the Web or engage in some IRC conversations, I would go to a cybercafé.       That gave me a chance to socialize a bit while I would be doing my       Internet-related stuff, albeit that I did find the Windows 9x       installations there rather irritating, and so when I finally got an       Internet connection at home, I was then able to go on the Web and on       IRC, and to send and receive e-mails and participate in Usenet       discussions, all from my own GNU/Linux machine.              Having an Internet connection at home certainly changed my life, and I'm       guessing that this applies to most other people of my generation as       well. Suddenly your connectivity with other people - even in remote       locations - improves immensely, and secondly, if you want information on       any given subject, it's all there at your fingertips, albeit that I must       admit that I was somewhat disappointed in the way the Web quickly got       transformed from a gigantic library into an even more gigantic       marketplace. If you're simply looking for information on something       nowadays by way of a search engine, then instead of finding the       information on what it is or how it works, you are presented with       information on where to buy it albeit that "at what price" is usually       conveniently left out. Well, in a manner of speaking, of course. But       you know what I mean.              Kids these days grow up entirely differently. I'm only 50 years old now       as of a few months ago, but when I was a young boy, we didn't even have       a TV set at first, and when we then finally got one, it was black &       white. Kids these days grow up with color TV, gaming consoles, MP3       players, laptops, cellphones and Facebook. They've never known it to be       any different.              They don't go and play outside on summer days, building camps from       trees, branches and old linen, and pretend that they are medieval       knights, or cowboys and Indians, or cops and robbers, or Captain Kirk       and Mister Spock for that matter. They just pull up the laptop and chat       on Facebook while listening to droning music. Their whole psychological       development happens in a very different way. In the old days, drivers       would be careful when there were kids playing football near the road -       that's "soccer" for US Americans :p - because the ball might go off the       field and onto the road, and a small kid would be running after it,       unaware of traffic. Nowadays, as a driver, you have to be extra careful       not to run over the kids crossing the street while texting, and who       don't hear your car approaching as they're wearing earphones to listen       to their MP3 player. It's like they're connected to everything in       existence, except for their actual physical environment.              Was it better in "my time"? I don't know. Some parts were definitely       better, yes. At least kids of my generation had imagination. In other              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca