XPost: alt.feminism, soc.women, alt.music.nirvana   
   From: shukun@basichelp.com   
      
   On 1/17/2005 7:30 PM I could possibly be going insane but I swear that   
   st_ev_fe@hotmail.com said in a message that was only meant for me:   
      
   > I'm not sure if anyone realised that I had reasons for this post. So   
   > I'll post a few of them:   
   >   
   > *--*   
   >   
   > Male and female are the perfect partner for each other? Or is it that   
   > the parasite and host are the perfect partner for each other.   
   >   
   > All we know of masculine and feminine is a lie.   
   >   
   > All the stuff (true and popular myth) like that females must be   
   > charming, innocent, gentle, manipulative, soft, beautiful... and that   
   > males must be strong, tough, resourceful, hard, honest, chivalrous,   
   > aggressive... that is just a lie.   
   >   
   > When you peel all of the lies away, and get to the truth of the whole   
   > issue of what is going on on this planet, it comes down that female is   
   > about parasite, and male is about host.   
   >   
   > You can't have a parasite without a host.   
   >   
   > You can't have a host without a parasite. A host without a parasite is   
   > healthy. A parasite without a host is dead, or weakened.   
   >   
   > Parasites control. Parasites change the chemistry or neural wiring of   
   > their host, making the host do strange things. (read up on parasites in   
   > case you don't know this). Some parasites change their hosts behaviour,   
   > so the host is likely to get eaten, thus allowing the parasites life   
   > cycle to continue inside the new host.   
   >   
   > Females control, through their control of reproduction.   
   >   
   > Parasites drain. Females expect males to protect and provide for them.   
   >   
   > Parasites are weak and stupid. Females are weak and stupid.   
   >   
   > Parasites atrophy, losing limbs, eyes, coloring even during their   
   > evolution deeper into parasitism. Females atrophy, losing strong   
   > ankles, strong muscles, and a brain capable of abstract reasoning.   
   >   
   > Parasites are manipulative, they cover their parasitism, hiding it so   
   > the host doesn't realise. Females lie, they act and seem all sweet and   
   > innocent when they are doing evil. They blame it on their hormones   
   > depression or anything other but themselves, when they get caught.   
   >   
   > Parasites sometimes kill their host without intending to, they don't   
   > want their host to die, but they must also drain the most possible from   
   > their host. Females often encourage their sons/partners to fight or   
   > protect and provide in other ways, and then mourn their lost "loved   
   > one".   
   >   
   > Parasites don't mind having their host lead hard unsatisfying lives,   
   > they are just interested in the blood. Females don't mind sending their   
   > sons to the army, or demanding their partners be much richer than she   
   > via hard unsatisfying work (banking industry?).   
   >   
   > Hosts feel sick and weakened. Males aren't allowed to have emotions,   
   > and due to the harder life they are forced into, live shorter lives   
   > despite being stronger.   
   >   
   > Hosts get their behaviour controlled. Males ignore female negativity   
   > and evilness, because they don't want to lose the support of their   
   > women.   
   >   
   > So then, is femaleness truely about parasitism? If for example, we   
   > instead happened to be part of a humanoid species acting like "the   
   > spotted sandpiper", would the guys act and seem "feminine" and the   
   > females seem "masculine" according to the full extent of our best   
   > current stereotypes? Would the females have vaginas and beards? Would   
   > the males have penises, and be weaker and stupider?   
   >   
   > So what is femininity? Are there real qualities that should go along   
   > with being female? Imagine that females weren't evil parasites. Would   
   > females have qualities that males don't have, and males have qualities   
   > that females don't have?   
   >   
   > Can we see that almost everything we know about females, could just be   
   > a part of their parasite role. That what we thought was "gods blessing"   
   > that us males find females sexy, could just be part of their   
   > parasitism.   
   >   
   > I think it is possible, that underneath all of that qualities we   
   > associate with females, there are some that are "Archetypal" to a true   
   > female? One researcher on evolution, showed that the female secondary   
   > characteristics (breasts, hips) were chosen by males, not by survival   
   > of the fittest.   
   >   
   > Could it be, that a host (male) making a criteria for his partner, is   
   > more likely to make decisions based on love and art? Because he plays   
   > the host role, and not the parasite role he is far less likely to make   
   > evil partner choices. I find the female breasts and hips both   
   > artistically and physically attractive. Could it be, that unlike in   
   > most species, women have benefitted from a true partner choice for art?   
   >   
      
   WTF!   
      
   --   
      
   Welcome to TEH usenet, I am TEH GOD!!!!11   
      
   http://www.davegotbettersincebleach.com/   
      
   .:. removed .SF (spam filter) to reply .:.   
      
   In time, they will all bow...   
      
   I am the Becoming!   
      
   L.L. Shukun!   
      
             ~SiG~   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)