From: david@edenroad.demon.co.uk   
      
   On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:05:20 -0500, remove wrote:   
      
   > David Mitchell wrote:   
   >> Well, they "experiences" no passage of time; but photons aren't eternal -   
   >> they only last as long as it takes for them to be absorbed.   
   >>   
   > See you really don't get the duality of light.   
   >   
   > Nor do you get the nature of the universe.   
   >   
   > If you did you would not make such a statement.  It has no validity.   
   >   
   > What photon.  The "Photon" does not exist until you test for it.   
      
   Only if you accept the Copenhagen interpretation of QM; which I don't.   
   There _is_ no reason to choose one interpretation over another - they're   
   about what the theory _means_, not what it _is_.   
      
   If you think about it, the Copenhagen Interpretation is self-referential   
   to a degree which makes it look suspiciously implausible, to me at least.   
      
   > You don't get it.   
      
   So you say.   
      
   But that's _all_ you say: your "arguments" consist of woolly rhetoric and   
   dogmatic judgements.   
      
   A bit more "meat" would be nice, if you are able.   
      
   --   
   =======================================================================   
   = David    --- If you use Microsoft products, you will, inevitably, get   
   = Mitchell --- viruses, so please don't add me to your address book.   
   =======================================================================   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)