From: blah@blah.com   
      
   personalpages.tds.net/~rcsilk wrote:   
   > "David Mitchell"  wrote   
   >   
   >>On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 02:33:07 -0600, personalpages.tds.net/~rcsilk wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>"David Mitchell"  wrote in message   
   >   
   > silk said:   
   >   
   >>>there's no nonsense here... your eyeballs DO transmit signals to your   
   >>>brain... I was referring, I believe, to the concept that neurons firing   
   >>>thru your body indeed give off chemical energy forms of light.   
   >>   
   >>"Chemical energy forms of light".   
   >>   
   >>If you're talking about nerve impulses, then describing them thus is so   
   >>elliptical as to be inaccurate.   
   >   
   >   
   > I know I'm going to mis-spell this, but:  Kirlean effect.   
   >   
   >   
   >>But you weren't, you said:   
   >>   
   >>>>then so too your thoughts may be re-converted and formed in your   
   >>>>"mind's eye" (or the back of your retina) and transmitted back out thru   
   >>>>your eyes, only in a much much more gentler form of energy."   
   >>   
   >>Which is simply, as you might put it, bullshit.   
   >   
   >   
   > Here's what you do not know, so take this info and process it in whatever   
   > blender you have:   
   > Before I had lasik, I could look in a bathroom mirror using only indirect,   
   > shadowed sunlight, and whilst gazing downwards, could detect something very   
   > much like (what I consider to be) astral light photons emitting from my   
   > eyes, focused downward towards whatever it was I was gazing at near the base   
   > of the mirror.  MY eyes "transmit" (or did, prior to lasik, which destroyed   
   > my near-vision.)  Furthermore, you can get an idea for yourself what these   
   > light photons looked like if you take a standard red laser, aim it in a   
   > mirror, and direct the light beam PAST your eyes (NOT directly back into   
   > them!) but near the side of your head.  In the mirror, you will see the path   
   > of the laser photons, and no, they're not reflecting upon dust particles.   
   > This is something you actually have to try in order to understand.   
   >   
   >   
   >>>this is simply a bull-shit way of saying that the eyes are the windows   
   >>>to the soul.   
   >>   
   >>If that's what you mean, say so.  Don't invent pseudo-scientific   
   >>mumbo-jumbo to dress it up with.   
   >   
   >   
   > It's called Freedom of Speech, you fuck-nut.   
   >   
   >   
   >>>Of course, you don't believe you have a soul, so this (of   
   >>>course) means nothing to you.  You're philosophically handicapped.   
   >>   
   >>And you're scientifically illiterate.   
   >   
   >   
   > Not everyone on this planet writes for science digests.  I write what I   
   > experience in as clear a terminology as I *prefer* for the *average reader,*   
   > shit-weasel.   
   >   
   >   
   >>>>Dick, the rods and cones do not transmit.  Period.   
   >>>   
   >>>what utter bullshit!  of COURSE they transmit, otherwise you'd not be   
   >>>able to distinguish between dark / light / colors / motion!   
   >>   
   >>They do not transmit in the way you are talking about.   
   >   
   >   
   > Fuck-face:  anything that can be used as a *raw* receiver can be reversed as   
   > a transmitter.  True, the quality is largely much poorer or lower than for   
   > something *designed* as a transmitter, which -- incidentally -- can also be   
   > used as a receiver.  Take for instance speakers and microphones:  just   
   > reverse the jack you've got them plugged into, and *presto!* a mic becomes a   
   > speaker, and a speaker becomes a mic.   
   >   
   >   
   >>>And furthermore, David, it's well established that you and I do NOT see   
   >>>eye-to-eye on just about everything, so do ME a favor and just can-it.   
   >>   
   >>No.  I'll continue to correct your scientific boo-boo's, so long as you   
   >>continue to pretend that you know what you're talking about.   
   >   
   >   
   > For the last time, queer-mo, I *only* write about what I know.  I ASK about   
   > what I do NOT know.   
   >   
   > Don't bother replying:  you've taken enough of my time already.  You're   
   > kill-filed.   
   >   
   >   
      
   Dick   
      
     Mate, please don't ever change.  Your writing style cracks me up  :)))  David   
   and your online arguements can be absolutely hilarious; on one side you have   
   someone trying to be articulate and on the other you have someone who doesn't   
   give a rat's arse and says it how he see's it/it is.   
      
     The technique seems to work for me personally, but not straight away; it   
   takes   
   about 5 minutes.  Last night I had this kind of swirling whitish light tunnel   
   and an amazing feeling throughout my body.  Many thanks.   
      
      
   Kudos   
   Shane-o  =]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)