From: david@edenroad.demon.co.uk
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 20:22:04 -0600, personalpages.tds.net/~rcsilk wrote:
> "Janice" wrote in message
> news:MPG.1c6c2ada5715cdf598a294@news.individual.net...
>> In article ,
>> david@edenroad.demon.co.uk says...
>>>On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 21:06:03 -0600, personalpages.tds.net/~rcsilk wrote:
>>
>>>"Imagine your eyeballs not just as RECEIVERS of light, but also of
>>>TRANSMITTERS
>>>as well. Now imagine Light as being the "common currency" of thoughts and
>>>actions: as the information you receive visually (as light thru the eye)
>>>gets
>>>encoded into your brain electrochemically, then so too your thoughts may
>>>be
>>>re-converted and formed in your "mind's eye" (or the back of your retina)
>>>and
>>>transmitted back out thru your eyes, only in a much much more gentler form
>>>of
>>>energy."
>>>
>>>Dick, the rods and cones do not transmit. Period. Science by analogy
>>>doesn't work.
>
>
> Janice: Poor David is so hopelessly hung up on scientific technicalities
> that he cannot allow himself to stretch his limited imagination far enough
> to consider possibilities beyond the norm. I've known eyes to transmit
> light.
No you haven't, your experience is, as we've already established, a poorer
guide than most to reality.
> I've seen my own as well as the eyes of others transmit light. The
> very fact that you can achieve red-eye by taking a camera flash proves, at
> *least*, that eyes can REFLECT light.
Irrelevant.
> So, if something can act as a
> reflector as well as a receiver, is it not too far a stretch to consider
> that they are also transmitters?
Yes. Consider the humble mirror.
Red-eye is light reflected from the blood vessels at the back of the eye.
Hence the colour.
Reflected, Dick, not emitted.
>
> Other things to consider:
> Psychics refer to a person's left eye (your opposing right eye, as you see
> them... their eye on your right side) as the "heart" eye, which reflects a
> person's emotions. A person's *right* eye, which is their eye on *your*
> left side of a person facing you, is called the "thought" eye.
>
> To make this a little clearer (and simpler!) let's just talk about one's
> self:
> My left eye is closer to the major (pulmonary?) arteries of my heart, and
> thus, it is closer to my "emotional organ," thus it's my "heart eye." My
> right eye, otoh, is not so close to the heart's arteries, but rather, to the
> brain's veins, so it is considered the "thought eye."
I see your knowledge of biology is as laughable as your physics knowledge.
Christ Dick, get a clue.
>
> Using your right eye to view *directly ahead* into someone else's opposing
> eye (their left) gives you the ability to read as well as /suggest thoughts
> into/ their emotions.
Nonsense.
> I never look another man in his right eye, as that is
> "lazy" and often leads to submission to another man's intellectual
> dominance.
Wow. You're even weirder than I thought you were. Why are you so hung up
on other men?
> BAD thing for a guy to do! (Unless you're DM and LIKE getting
> rear-ended!)
And homosexuality.
> Looking into a woman's eyes, however, I stick to her left (my
> right) as much as possible, thus influencing her emotions, but it is often
> advisable to check her right (across from my left) periodically just to test
> if there's actually something going on inside there that I need to be
> appraised of!
So, let's see the checklist:
Obsession with other men, casual misogyny, obsession with homosexuality.
I think I see a pattern here.
--
=======================================================================
= David --- If you use Microsoft products, you will, inevitably, get
= Mitchell --- viruses, so please don't add me to your address book.
=======================================================================
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
