From: david@edenroad.demon.co.uk   
      
   On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:36:55 -0500, lorz wrote:   
      
   > David Mitchell wrote:   
   >> On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:18:03 -0500, lorz wrote:   
   > I was repeating you in regard to science. I meant science will for the   
   > time being. It will or might be subject to change with future findings.   
      
   Oh I see, yes, you're right - science will never be able to claim   
   "absolute" knowledge, 'cos that's not how it works - but it always   
   continues to approach it.   
      
   >>>I agree subjectiveness won't ever be the authority *but* it may help to   
   >>>understand and perhaps eliminate possibilities. I'm just saying it's a   
   >>>useful tool as well.   
   >> MMV   
   >   
   > Does that mean it isn't useful at all, in your opinion?   
      
   We'd have to define "subjectivity" a little more closely for me to be   
   _that_ dogmatic; and I'm aware that there are circumstances in which   
   subjective experience _is_ the phenomenon under investigation - but,   
   generally, no.   
      
   --   
   =======================================================================   
   = David    --- If you use Microsoft products, you will, inevitably, get   
   = Mitchell --- viruses, so please don't add me to your address book.   
   =======================================================================   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)