From: laura@nospam.me   
      
   "David Mitchell"  wrote in message   
   news:pan.2005.02.22.06.50.13.2282@edenroad.demon.co.uk...   
   > On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:40:55 +0000, LH wrote:   
   >   
   > >> Of course, it would have to be taken by a well-known sceptic, otherwise   
   > >> it couldn't be trusted ;-)   
   > >   
   > > Ah ha!  So a well-known speptic, who by default, doesn't believe there's   
   > > any evidence to support the existance of ufos, is going to investigate   
   > > them, that is funny.  :-)   
      
   Well, letting a semi-religious UFO believer investigate it would be even   
   more funny, and the result would be utterly predictable :-) It's like   
   letting a devout christian investigate whether or not there is a God. What   
   are the odds of a negative on that one? :-)   
   It should be investigated by someone who adheres strictly to the scientific   
   method. Such a person would not believe either way, being interested only in   
   the evidence.   
      
   >   
   > I'd do it.  So would any genuine sceptic.  I'm using it in the proper   
   > sense here, not the usual way it's bandied about in this newsgroup.   
      
   I'd do it, too, and I don't know in advance what the result would turn out   
   to be.   
   The only thing I'm fairly sure of is that unknown objects are in the skies.   
   What they are is another matter.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)