From: david@edenroad.demon.co.uk   
      
   On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 06:01:13 +0000, Corey wrote:   
      
   Hi Corey, since you haven't answered any but the most trivial of the   
   points Laura raised, I thought I'd put them to you again.   
      
   > "Laura" wrote in message   
   > news:cvgsgf$1r43$10@news.cybercity.dk...   
   >>> Don't you two remember the oil for food scandal? The UN is obviously   
   >> corrupt   
   >>> and have no credibility . Weapons of mass destruction (perhaps moved to   
   >>> Syria)   
   >>   
   >> Speculation.   
   >>   
   >>> were only 1 of many reasons to go to Iraq, like Saddams support of   
   >>> terrorists.   
   >>   
   >> There was one, ONE, stated reason for going to Iraq; the WMDs. The other   
   >> reasons were laid out once it started to look like there were no WMDs   
   >> there.   
   >>   
   >> Saddam did not support terrorism very much if at all. Nothing remotely   
   >> on the scale of that given by Saudi Arabia (ally of the U.S.), Iran,   
   >> Pakistan (ally of the U.S.), and numerous African countries. So, the   
   >> U.S. has at least two allies who are supporting terrorists on a large   
   >> scale, so the U.S.   
   >> attacks Iraq. Almost looks like Iraq was never meant to be part of the   
   >> war on terror, but is part of another agenda.   
   >>   
   >>> Things are clearly getting much better in Iraq and Afghanistan, if you   
   >>> look at the facts instead of the slogans of the left.   
   >>   
   >> Things may be getting better, but that does not make the WMDs in Iraq   
   >> exist.   
   >> It was a lie; a bogus reason fed to a gullible public, who predictably   
   >> supported the war because of the mushroom cloud images planted in their   
   >> minds. The war was clearly in violation of international law. The fact   
   >> that   
   >> things seem to be going rather well in Iraq now does not make the   
   >> invasion any less of a criminal act. It is the international version of   
   >> vigilanteism.   
   >> If you know someone to be criminal and proceed to seek them out and   
   >> shoot them instead of letting the system deal with them, you are a   
   >> criminal. There   
   >> are no excuses for it that'll hold up in court.   
      
   --   
   =======================================================================   
   = David --- If you use Microsoft products, you will, inevitably, get   
   = Mitchell --- viruses, so please don't add me to your address book.   
   =======================================================================   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|