From: laura@nospam.me
"Corey" wrote in message
news:sV8Td.8772$Pz7.7121@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "David Mitchell" wrote in message
> news:pan.2005.02.23.07.57.24.335069@edenroad.demon.co.uk...
> > On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:10:10 +0000, Corey wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> "LH" wrote in message
> >> news:i5PSd.3259$MY6.1213@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> They
> >>>>> would make utterly horrible intelligence analysis's. Where one has
to
> >>>>> take often circumstantial evidence and turn it into something
usable.
> >>>>> They'd never have enough evidence to make a case for anything...
> >>>>
> >>>> Like, for example, invading a sovereign country on the basis of
weapons
> >>>> which don't exist...
>
> Corey Says-
>
> Yeah. We just went into Iraq for the fun of it.
Nobody is suggesting that. Simply that whatever the real reason was, it had
nothing to do with WMDs, and that makes the U.S. administration liars.
> It had nothing to do with
> Saddams constant support of terrorists.
What? Do you pull that information out of your arse? Saddam has never
supported terrorists. He may be considered a terrorist himself, but he was
never friendly with the radical islamist types such as Al-Qaeda. They never
liked him, because he didn't want to impose islamic law in Iraq.
> Killing of his own people. Shooting
> at our military when he surrendered after the Gulf War. Saddam and his
pure
> Sovereign country. Bad America and its allies. good Saddam. Bla Bla Blah.
> What a joke.
No. Bad America AND bad Saddam. Two wrongs don't make a right, you know.
You are suffering from the common misunderstanding that liberals like
Saddam. They don't. They're simply pointing out that the way in which the
war was initiated was in violation of international law.
>
> >>>
> >>> That's what happens when you tell the analysis's (sp?) what to say.
>
> Corey Says-
>
> You have secret information on Bush the CIA and the rest of the
intelligence
> bureaus and how hey conspired this? Any proof? end.
It's no secret, really, though I guess the propaganda outlets you frequent
don't tell you about such things.
>
> >>>
> >>>>> Even then, there will always be a small contingent who will claim it
> >>>>> was faked. Personally, I see know reason to expect this situation
to
> >>>>> change. I only hope that when the warmongers tell us that the ETs
are
> >>>>> bad, that there will be skeptics around to confront them. ;-) --
> >>>>> Lonnie
> >>>>
> >>>> See, we do have our uses. ;-)
> >>>
> >>> I never said you didn't or if I did I retract it. :-)
> >>>
> >>>> Not that I expect it to make a difference, the UN weapons inspectors
> >>>> did their best to tell shrub that there were no weapons, but he just
> >>>> disbanded
> >>>> them. :-(
> >>>
> >>> They weren't saying the right things. Therefore, disband them...
> >> Corey Says-
> >>
> >> Don't you two remember the oil for food scandal? The UN is obviously
> >> corrupt and have no credibility . Weapons of mass destruction (perhaps
> >> moved to Syria) were only 1 of many reasons to go to Iraq, like
Saddams
> >> support of terrorists. end.
> >
> > US citizens gave the IRA millions. In case you don't know, the IRA is a
> > terrorist organisation which was still active in this country at the
time.
> >
> > I rarely see calls to bomb New York.
> >
> > The US government gives around $750 Million each year to Israel - a
> > country which invaded the very nation which gave it sanctuary when it
> > needed it most, and which has failed to comply with dozens of UN
> > resolutions (rather than the _one_ which Iraq was invaded on the pretext
> > on), and has bombed installations in other countries in direct violation
> > of international law.
> >
> > Mind you, so has the US (Somalia and Russia).
>
> Corey Says-
>
> If I had my way the US wouldn't give squat to any countries including the
> PLO and the rest of them. if your numbers are correct which I somehow
doubt.
> end.
The PLO isn't a country.
The numbers, however, are correct.
> >
> >> Things are clearly getting much better in Iraq and
> >> Afghanistan, if you look at the facts instead of the slogans of the
left.
> >> end.
> >
> > 1,000+ dead US soldiers
>
> Corey Says-
>
> Do you know how many US Soldiers die every year without war? Clue. About
800
> a year or so. How long has this war on terror been going on? Since 2001.
> Figure it out. end.
Yes, this has been explained in the media. The death toll figures that the
army are releasing while engaged in Iraq does not include deaths from any
non-combat events.
>
>
> > 100,000 dead Iraqi civilians, and counting.
>
> Corey Says-
>
> Yeah. Bush is to soft. Should have leveled the Sunni triangle in Iraq.
Shows
> they have very cool heads. end.
Oh, is that what they should have done? And here I was thinking you'd go
with the good old "Just nuke'em all and turn it into a parking lot!".
>
> >
> > Also, the stage is set for a bloody civil war in two to three years time
> > as the Sunni and Shia populations fight it out.
> >
> > Not to mention the millions of very pissed off muslims around the world.
> > When payback time comes, you will deserve it.
> >
> > As will we.
> >
>
> Corey Says-
>
> Most of the people in Iraq and Afghanistan are glad we finally went in. As
> always, the Liberals are living in a negative fantasy world.
No they don't. They simply happen to care about international law.
> A world in
> which we should do nothing to help ourselves. What can we do to make the
> psycho's of the world like us?
So all countries that disagree with the U.S. are necessarily psychos?
> What mistake have we made? It must be are
> fault. Don't do anything yet........ we might make them mad! Maybe
tomorrow
> not today, in this way! Blaa Blaahh Blah...........................Blah.
> end.
Well then enlist and go to Iraq. Go today, not tomorrow. Shoo.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
