XPost: alt.religion.eckankar, alt.conspiracy, alt.revisionism   
   XPost: alt.meditation.shabda   
   From: kahlahm@att.not   
      
   "tdk"  wrote ...   
   >   
   > On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 21:26:12 GMT, cher  wrote:   
   >   
   >>Oh really? Show us the proof of this! Or do you make this stuff up as   
   >>you go in the tradition of david lane? Hmmm? When you can't show proof   
   >>you weasel out of it by suggesting it's possible...maybe, just think   
   >>about it and maybe you could buy it? LOL....   
   >   
   > This is obviously an emotionally charged issue for you,   
   > and I have presented the information I wanted to present.   
   > There is not really much more to add. Your questions are   
   > all fully answered in the text I referenced. Perhaps you might   
   > consider reading it sometime.   
      
      
   EVERYONE who's posted here for any length of time has read   
   it.  Large parts of it have been debunked.  Lane's overinflated thesis   
   has more holes than a finely aged Swiss cheese.  Google the a.r.e.   
   archives and you will find thousands of messages over a period of   
   years on all sides of this issue.   
      
   To come here and preach this stuff just marks you as more or less   
   clueless.   
      
   Take some time and actualy read Dougs book if you are willing to   
   open your mind to a perspective from the other side of the issue.   
      
   Or not, as you see fit.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)