XPost: alt.religion.eckankar, alt.meditation.shabda   
   From: emptyroom@emptyroom.emptyroom   
      
   On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:37:56 GMT, cher  wrote:   
      
   >Rich wrote:   
   >>   
   >> "lackpurity"  wrote   
   >>   
   >> > MM:   
   >> > I don't think so:   
   >> >   
   >> > Maharaj Kirpal Singh Ji:   
   >> > He changed that book before printing; where he mentioned my name, he   
   >> > changed it to another guru's name..."   
   >> >   
   >> > MM:   
   >> > He doesn't say whether the other Guru was real or fictional.   
   >>   
   >> He classified him as a Guru.  Would he do so if he thought he wasn't   
   >> real?  Maybe he knew of him.  I don't know.   
   >   
   >that point has been raised for eons on this group, but of course people   
   >just ignore it. Their own teacher recognizes that this person is real!   
   >Oh well... not like that much does sink in with them anyway.    
   >   
   >> I do know that Paul wanted his experience published.  Kirpal wasn't   
   >> going to do it. Paul had to fight to get his manuscrpit back. It seems   
   >> right that Paul didn't use his name if Kirpal was not in favor of Paul's   
   >> teachings.   
      
   You two seem to be missing something that should be obvious here.   
   Since Kirpal Singh's name was the original master's name used in the   
   manuscript, and Paul later changed this name to a different name because   
   Kirpal Singh didn't approve of the book, then Paul was not being truthful.   
   Also, India is a heavily populated country, Kirpal Singh likely would   
   have no idea whether the other name substituted was that of a real   
   person or not.   
      
   empty room - 975th Living Truth Master (on probation)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)