XPost: alt.religion.eckankar, alt.meditation.shabda   
   From: JerryC@adelphia.net   
      
   Maybe Paul interpreted Kirpal's lack of outer connection with the dawning   
   that perhaps that inner master whom appeared to paul was not Kirpal at all   
   but some other master. Perhaps Rebezar.   
      
   I say this because it has been my experience that these masters do not care   
   under whose identity you asume that they are.   
      
   Paul says that Jesus was not the mahanta of the times but also states that   
   Jesus was the mahanta as it appeared to Jesus's followers.   
      
   J   
      
   "lackpurity"  wrote in message   
   news:1114802650.662683.121300@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...   
   > >From what Kirpal Singh Ji Maharaj said, the book was sent to him for   
   > his stamp of approval.  Am I right?  When Kirpal wasn't quite ready to   
   > approve it, then Paul wanted the book sent back to him, and then the   
   > changing of the names occurred.   
   >   
   > You talk about a Master/Slave relationship?  Hardly.  Why should a   
   > Master approve something, which he disaproves?  I think we need to cut   
   > Maharaj Kirpal Singh Ji some slack, here.  After all, wasn't it Paul   
   > Twitchell who said he took the dictation from Kirpal on the INSIDE?   
   >   
   > If Maharaj Kirpal Singh Ji played such a big part in the book, then why   
   > not give him credit for that?  That is a question which arises in my   
   > mind.   
   >   
   > Michael   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)