XPost: alt.religion.eckankar, alt.meditation.shabda   
   From: emptyroom@emptyroom.emptyroom   
      
   On Mon, 09 May 2005 18:11:47 GMT, "MICHAEL TURNER"  wrote:   
      
   >This is not the way of Naam.   
      
   So what then is the way of Naam? Does the way of Naam   
   include arguing about who ultimately possesses the deepest   
   and truest spiritual understanding? Does the spirit ever need to   
   prove or justify itself to anyone or anything? Is not the truth fully   
   expressed through the master's righteous behavior? If so, then   
   what is there ever for a master to prove?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)