XPost: alt.religion.eckankar, alt.meditation.shabda   
   From: JerryC@adelphia.net   
      
   I agree with what you have said here.   
      
   Absolute truth needs no defense nor does it need amplification.   
      
   We may disagree in our opinions as to what the truth may be but from this   
   post i can see that we agree that whatever it is, it cannot be denied. (or   
   something like that)   
      
   J   
      
   "empty room"  wrote in message   
   news:mrc0819fruc7mt914ol5audln3mekjfo3j@4ax.com...   
   > On Mon, 09 May 2005 18:11:47 GMT, "MICHAEL TURNER"   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >>This is not the way of Naam.   
   >   
   > So what then is the way of Naam? Does the way of Naam   
   > include arguing about who ultimately possesses the deepest   
   > and truest spiritual understanding? Does the spirit ever need to   
   > prove or justify itself to anyone or anything? Is not the truth fully   
   > expressed through the master's righteous behavior? If so, then   
   > what is there ever for a master to prove?   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)