XPost: alt.religion.eckankar, alt.meditation.shabda
From: emptyroom@emptyroom.emptyroom
On Sat, 21 May 2005 19:19:27 GMT, cher wrote:
>And any fool on usenet knows about the tactic of demanding someone
>"disprove a negative". I personally think it's easy to spot a fraud too.
>They start out by suggesting others should disprove the negative they
>state, and then pat themself on the back for being clever. If you cannot
>point to a True Master, then you actually have nothing to offer beyond
>patting yourself on the back? Because from what you've said... your
>opinions are no better than anyone elses. Something else one learns on
>usenet... absolute statements from annoymous posters are generally not
>worth the pixels to see them.
Poor Cherie, you make no sense. If someone makes claims about
what or who they are, and through their actions clearly does not live up
to those claims, then they are obviously a fake. Ranting and raving
about it will not change this.
>LOL... If you have nothing to offer the group in terms of a True Master
>(you laid the points of comparison here), then what you offer here is of
>little value. That's not frightening, that's a waste of time. Big
>difference where I come from. All I see is a one trick pony! YAWN......
It is not me who is making claims about what a "True Master" is
or is not, it is the fake master who makes these claims and then
clearly demonstrates through their actions that they are not at all
what *they* claim to be. Distort my words if you wish Cher, but it
accomplishes nothing. Those who contradict their own words
about who they are, are fakes, and it will eventually become obvious
to those who are paying attention, and who have a genuine desire to
see the truth. Sorry, if such an observation makes you so uneasy.
Have a nice day!
empty room - 975th Living Truth Master
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
