XPost: alt.feminism, soc.men, soc.women   
   From: cu.cindy@gmail.removethis.com   
      
   Dick Silk - The Computer Tutor wrote:   
   > "sef" wrote in message   
   > news:1126823379.534840.14540@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...   
   >   
   >>Well, if you consider that those men have already been mentally   
   >>"groomed" by women, like a pedophile grooms children, then perhaps you   
   >>could see this as a form of having been controlled by evil females?   
   >   
   >   
   > Your pedophile reference appears to be designed to strike controversy.   
   > (NEVER feed the trolls!) It's just that -- after being divorced twice   
   > already -- I am (unfortunately) un-groomable.   
   You don't bathe?   
   > I'm just too "male" to be tamed by a female.   
   You haven't even see my whip yet; how can you be so sure?   
   > No, I'm not gay/queer/homosexual. My asshole is exit-only.   
   Heh! Tell them that at your next prostate exam.   
   > So to answer your question: no, I'm not controlled by evil females,   
   By good and kind ones, then?   
   > but -- hey! if any evil females out there are willing to give this wild   
   stud (horse analogy,   
   *pants*   
   > not so much as personality type) their best shot,   
   Oh.   
   *crestfallen*   
   I sorta thought you were referring to anatomy with that horse reference.   
   > BRING IT ON!   
   > };^>   
      
   Err, bring *what* on?   
   I thought the idea was to get it off?   
      
   -- Cu.C   
      
   [Who says size doesn't matter? Just try finding a strappy red sandal   
   with 3" spike heels in a size ten-and-a-half!]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|