XPost: alt.feminism, soc.men, soc.women   
   XPost: alt.music.nirvana   
   From: boya@home.com   
      
   "sef"  wrote in message   
   news:1127411054.202967.112350@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...   
   > So, by law a woman can expose parts of her breasts (or all of them   
   > sometimes). And that's legal.   
   >   
   > But if they get touched by someone, this can be considered a crime.   
   >   
   > Isn't that interesting. If a guy shows off his dick, or parts of his   
   > dick even, he gets considered to be a sex pest. And if he gets touched   
   > non-consentually, legally at least, he is protected by the law against   
   > this. So there is parity here. Crime for exposure and protection   
   > against touch.   
   >   
   > Why is it that females are allowed to have a contradictorary status?   
   > NO crime for exposure but protection against touch.   
   >   
   > Maybe it should only be considered a sex crime for a certain part of   
   > you to be touched non-consentually, if that part is not allowed to be   
   > exposed publically?   
   >   
   > Maybe it should be like this, women could choose one or the other:   
   > 1) It's not a sex crime to squeeze a woman's tits, and she is allowed   
   > to show them as much as she likes.   
   >   
   > 2) It is a sex crime to squeeze a woman's tits, but she isn't allowed   
   > to show off any breast or else she is being a sex pest.   
   >   
   > The way the law works of course, is mandated by WOMEN. Women's natural   
   > way of feeling has defined the law.   
   >   
   > It is like this, because almost every female wants to expose her   
   > breasts, because of a natural whore instinct, and also wants protection   
   > from being touched without first being paid.   
   >   
   > I wonder if guys are legally allowed to TALK about what they see, also?   
   > We can see their breasts in our faces seeing as they put them there so   
   > much, but are we allowed to talk about what we see? Are we allowed to   
   > make comments to her, about her breasts?   
   >   
   > It's legal for people to make comments about my face, or hair, or   
   > hands, or whatever parts of me I show. In fact I don't show very much   
   > flesh evne though I have a nicely shaped body, even if I'm doing some   
   > exercise I'll keep a thin sleeveless shirt on.   
   >   
   > Women on the other hand can't do enough to flash their tits at   
   > everyone. They wear clothes that even I wouldn't wear, because they are   
   > that revealing, and I don't even have anything TO reveal on my chest!   
   >   
      
   Actually, I'm jealous because men can expose ALL their boobies and I can't!   
   Even those horrible, grotesque big as hell man-boobs are legal, ugh! YUCK!   
   LOL, you are a funny little man. I still haven't figured out if you're just   
   a normal person (well, not really _normal_ but maybe could pass-for-normal)   
   that likes to act deranged on UseNet or if you really are fucked up in the   
   head. I always wonder about these things when I notice people like you out   
   there in cyber-space.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)