From: david@edenroad.demon.co.uk   
      
   On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 15:58:18 -0500, Dick Silk - The Computer Tutor wrote:   
      
   > "David Mitchell"  wrote in message   
   > news:pan.2005.10.15.11.03.40.610077@edenroad.demon.co.uk...   
   >> On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 06:42:55 -0400, Janice wrote:   
   >>> On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:21:15 +0100, David Mitchell wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> In the sense that one can, sometimes, extract some useful commonalities   
   >>>> from anecdotal evidence, perhaps.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Otherwise, they have very little use.   
   >>>   
   >>> Unless you happen to be a folklorist, or an anthropologist, or a   
   >>> psychologist, or a social historian ...   
   >>   
   >> True; but I was assuming a different context: that of actually "verifying"   
   >> something.   
   >   
   > David, David, DAVID!... ... you KNOW you should never   
   > "assume...."   
      
   Hey Dick, I thought I was in your killfile.   
   Don't tell me you can't even use Outlook properly, you being a "Computer   
   Tutor" and all.   
      
   >> Yes, of course; but it's the veracity we're talking about.   
   >   
   > Um... to be specific, it's veracity *you* are talking about.  Everyone else   
   > seems to be discussing (and agreeing upon) the value of anecdotal evidence   
   > in scientific research.   
      
   No, the topic is "OOBE Verification."   
      
   The clue is in the header.   
      
   --   
   =======================================================================   
   = David    --- If you use Microsoft products, you will, inevitably, get   
   = Mitchell --- viruses, so please don't add me to your address book.   
   =======================================================================   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)