From: david@edenroad.demon.co.uk
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 03:08:26 -0500, Dick Silk - The Computer Tutor wrote:
> "David Mitchell" wrote in message
> news:pan.2005.10.20.21.06.13.63874@edenroad.demon.co.uk...
>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 11:45:45 -0500, Dick Silk - The Computer Tutor wrote:
>>
>>> "David Mitchell" wrote in message
>>> news:pan.2005.10.20.11.08.05.519808@edenroad.demon.co.uk...
>>>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 05:52:28 -0500, Dick Silk - The Computer Tutor
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "David Mitchell" wrote in message
>>>>> news:pan.2005.10.20.05.41.34.300072@edenroad.demon.co.uk...
>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:10:01 -0700, clave_scripts wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that one can explore the obe in a scientific manner under the
>>>>>>> auspices
>>>>>>> of phenomenology, for one
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How?
>>>>>
>>>>> step 1) go back to college
>>>>> step 2) present a thesis
>>>>> step 3) get your ass to work.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone with an _informed_ opinion?
>>>
>>> What? too lazy to do your own research?
>
>> Yeah, I have four years to throw away to disprove an ill-informed comment.
>
> If you can improve upon it, then do so. Otherwise, you have no room to
> criticize (other than the rights of free speech.)
Can I improve steps 1-3 as a means of finding out the way to explore OBE's
using phenomenology?
Of course I can: one step, ask someone who claims to know about it,
exactly what he means.
Takes a lot less than four years, doncha think?
--
=======================================================================
= David --- If you use Microsoft products, you will, inevitably, get
= Mitchell --- viruses, so please don't add me to your address book.
=======================================================================
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
