From: david@edenroad.demon.co.uk   
      
   On Sat, 03 Jun 2006 00:44:53 +0000, Your Name Here=Harvey wrote:   
      
   > In article ,   
   david@edenroad.demon.co.uk says...   
   >   
   > Anyone reading into the whys and wherefores of 9-11 just want to get to the   
   > bottom of it, to know what really happened.   
   > It would be nice if the black boxes were found, and the proper investigators   
   > allowed access to it.   
      
   Yes, it would have been nice.   
      
   > There is a site that claims all the footage of the Twin Towers were doctored,   
   > such that those planes shown could not have flown into the twin towers -   
      
   "Could not".  Ridiculous.   
      
   > of course, that is rather unbelievable, but plausible to a degree.   
   > That site goes into enormous detail to prove it's point.   
      
   Yep, and it's all made up.   
      
   > Even a summary of the timeline of 9-11 show that with the US having   
   > spent billions of taxpayers money on National Security, no airforce jet   
   > was shadowing these airliners before the 3 strikes against the USA.   
   > You have a masterly hijacking team, but they only caused minor casualities   
   > of only 3,000 people? Come on, get real - they flew past nucleur power   
   > stations and didn't consider them prime targets?   
   > Maybe they didn't know what a nucleur power station looked like?   
   > Maybe you won't even consider this simple logic - they went for the   
   > least amount of damage, and not maximum damage possible - at both the   
   > Twin Towers and Pentagon strike. Doesn't that strike you as being very odd?   
   > Maybe you'll put this down to luck, and not pre-planning down to the   
   > last detail.   
      
   No, as I said before, they were /symbolic/ targets, and, guess what, /it   
   worked/.   
      
   Here we are years later still talking about it, not to mention the fact   
   that it was used (falsely, of course, although 75% of Americans are too   
   stupid to realise this) as partial justification for illegally invading   
   Iraq, destabilising the whole Middle East, and "radicalising" tens of   
   thousands of muslims.   
      
   From their standpoint, that's a _result_.   
      
   Besides, as I pointed out to you, it's not known whether even a direct   
   strike on a nuclear facility would have destroyed it, and what effect that   
   would have had.   
      
   (And I can't take /too/ seriously, anyone who can't spell nuclear ;-)   
      
   > The whole 9-11 thing doesn't make any kind of real sense. It all seems   
   > to be a 'shock and awe' tactic, more than anything else.   
      
   Precisely.   
      
   >   
   > There is a claim that Bin Laden said he had nothing to do with 9-11, but   
   > of course, this comment would get panned by the mainstream media, that   
   > is fed information only via Washington. Oh that tape in which he is   
   > shown happy with 9-11 - that is an example of a hoaxed tape, planted to   
   > confirm the official story.   
      
   Do you have any good reason to believe that the tape is fake, or is   
   paranoia and distrust of your government enough for you?   
      
   --   
   =======================================================================   
   = David    --- No, not that one.   
   = Mitchell ---   
   =======================================================================   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)