Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.out-of-body    |    I guess everyone needs a self-vacation    |    7,897 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 7,155 of 7,897    |
|    David Mitchell to All    |
|    Re: Flight 92 was almost certainly shot     |
|    03 Jun 06 06:43:15    |
      From: david@edenroad.demon.co.uk              On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 18:56:03 -0500, BD wrote:              > Hi David. I totally agree that flight 92 was shot down! Here are some       > facts: (1) I was listening to NPR (National Public Radio) here in       > Wisconsin that morning the vents unfolded. They reported that a 4th plane       > (92) had been hijacked, and was being escorted by US military planes at that       > time. This announcement was only made "once" however, and never again. I       > suspect that the national media was ordered to "hush" about that one!              Or they made a mistake which they didn't want to repeat, once the facts       became known.              > (2) VP Cheney has made public statements that authorization for shooting       > down the flight had been given at the time.              So?              > (3) A cell phone communication by one of the passengers, reported there had       > been an "explosion" on the plane! (this will tend to happen, when an       > air-to-air missle strikes!)              Untrained, unreliable witness, under extreme stress.              I think that an explosion big enough to take down a commercial airliner       would have been a little more noticeable, and would have had greater       effects.              So, rather than "I think that was an explosion" you'd have heard "There's       been an explosion, the plane is out of control, we're on fire, we're going       down" etc.              > (4) The plane went down in a large open field, with no other casualties.       > (this was very well planned)              Or just a coincidence.       Why is it that you think that on the one hand they'd try to minimise       civilian casualties, and on the other that "they" were behind it all       anyway?              > (5) Witnesses reported another plane escorting flight 92, seconds before it       > crashed.              Ah, "witnesses".              > (6) Funny thing here,...they were "unable" to locate 92's black box for a       > long, long time, even though it crashed in an open field. But, they did       > find both boxes from the pile of rubble at the towers,.....long before       > flight 92's! (it takes awhile to manufacture a phoney!)              About a day. They're off the shelf at Boing, the hard part would be       programming it, but they could do that using a simulator.              --       =======================================================================       = David --- No, not that one.       = Mitchell ---       =======================================================================              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca