XPost: alt.dreams.lucid, alt.paranormal.channeling   
   From: david@edenroad.demon.co.uk   
      
   On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 15:29:00 -0800, h elmer | espeance wrote:   
      
   > to clarify, i'm not against science or the scientific method, in fact   
   > i support it, it's only an aspect of our reality, not the whole though   
   >   
   > can science describe the beauty of a rose, the taste of an orange, the   
   > brilliance of light glimmering of of rippling water - no, it can   
   > describe the "how" of the experience, the mechanics, but only a   
   > conscious awarenesss can have or be it, which points to an entirely   
   > different element of our reality, just as valuable, and just as   
   > substantial   
      
   And nothing to do with what the scientific method is _for_.   
      
   No-one has claimed here that either science or the SM are the only aspects   
   of reality - all I've ever claimed is that the SM is the best method   
   mankind has invented for discovering the truth (about how the universe   
   works).   
      
   --   
   =======================================================================   
   = David    --- If you use Microsoft products, you will, inevitably, get   
   = Mitchell --- viruses, so please don't add me to your address book.   
   =======================================================================   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)