From: retour@contactprospect.com   
      
   "hermes"  a écrit dans le message de news:   
   1170443369.145621.53730@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com   
      
   > I think you should be more friendly (or plain friendly).   
   > Some events in our lives are not evidential; however, we are   
   > uncomfortable   
   > with your label: anecdotal, if not worse.   
      
   "Anecdotal" is an excuse not to consider similar events.  The overwhelming   
   existence of such facts is thus denied, as if the flood of swallows didn't   
   make spring because one doesn't.   
      
   >> The only correct behaviour is to devise   
   >> other observations (waking up sooner, using a recorder...)   
      
   > What if the event won't repeat itself ? Some events don't.   
      
   Absolutely, it's the limitations of science.  The human being is way to   
   complex to have any chance of reproducibility.  That's why the physicians   
   work with probabilities.  For some persons, there haven't be able to save   
   them, and for those same persons, it's all what matters, even if it is only   
   1% failure.  On the other hand, there are recoveries that aren't explainable   
   by medicine.  So, paranormal phenomena may be anecdotal, that doesn't make   
   them non existing, and even not unlikely.   
      
   --   
   ~~~~ clmasse on free F-country   
   Liberty, Equality, Profitability.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)