From: david@edenroad.demon.co.uk   
      
   On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:13:22 -0800, Jimmy wrote:   
      
   > In Buhlman's "Adventures out of the body",  Part 2, Chapter 3, The New   
   > Frontier,  The Types of Energy Environments;   
   >   
   > He states that we should conduct our searches for further Universal   
   > knowledge using frequency based research.  In exploring the Universe,   
   > instead of using Hubble telescopes and man occupied vehicles or   
   > robots, we should use instruments, much like TV's that allow us to   
   > search any area,  in any frequency.   
      
   Sadly, not possible if you're talking about electromagnetic energy, if   
   only because the intensity falls off with the square of the distance, and   
   they only travel at the speed of light - so even if we could perceive   
   e-m of infinitely low energy (which we can't) there would still be parts   
   of the universe forever opaque to us, as their energy would not reach us   
   before the end of time.   
      
   > We should at least be able to   
   > view another dimension on the tv screen.   
      
   Assuming that there _are_ other dimensions, and that they behave ni this   
   way.   
      
   > I then looked up electromagnetic radiation spectrum and found this:   
   > The electromagnetic radiation spectrum is the complete range of the   
   > wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation, beginning with the longest   
   > radio waves (including those in the audio range) and extending through   
   > visible light (a very small part of the spectrum) all the way to the   
   > extremely short gamma rays that are a product of radioactive atoms.   
      
   Yep, and we can detect, with appropriate instrumentation, large chunks of   
   it.   
      
   > For our discussion here, we are concerned with frequency.  Frequency   
   > allows us to create from pure energy things, material things.   
      
   No it doesn't.  Not as stated, sorry.  You _can_, if you have enough   
   energy in a photon observe that it decomposes into subatomic particles   
   (according to the principle of mass-energy equivalence), but that's not   
   much use in practice.   
      
   > I do   
   > not know how we do this and I would think our OOBE people would   
   > certainly find out how.  And very fast too.  How does one control the   
   > proper energy account of a thought to create things that are solid?   
   > Yet our travelers say there is no solid, only a fog like form of   
   > created energy, energy that appears to us solid, but allows OOBE   
   > people to reach through with little effort.  We know that atoms have   
   > lots of space in them, molecules too.  But a piece of steel has got to   
   > have thier molecules packed so tightly, I don't know how the atoms can   
   > vibrate to produce solid.   
      
   In normal matter, atoms are surrounded by "shells" of electrons - in   
   molecules these shells interact, binding the atoms together.   
      
   In solid matter, these shells are sufficiently close together, and bound   
   sufficiently tightly, that the shells in the molecules of, for example,   
   your finger cannot pass through them (like charges, such as the negative   
   ones comprising electron shells, repel each other), and you therefore find   
   them to be solid.   
      
   > Mr. Buhlman stated "when we learn that we create what we think, we   
   > will no longer create negativity.  Every time you see an image in   
   > front of your eyes, it has been created by thought.  So if you see   
   > violence, you have created this violence, no one else.   
      
   This is just nonsense.   
      
   --   
   =======================================================================   
   = David    --- If you use Microsoft products, you will, inevitably, get   
   = Mitchell --- viruses, so please don't add me to your address book.   
   =======================================================================   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)