feb90e35   
   From: david@edenroad.demon.co.uk   
      
   ClearTonal wrote:   
   >   
   > Hi David,   
   >   
   > I meant that thinking 4 oneself and verifying the facts is good and   
   > should be done. You seem 2 be saying I meant the opposite; please   
   > reread my post. Also, every preacher could be tarred with the epithet   
   > 'known fanaticist'; so could anyone. Even you...?   
      
   That's "fantasist".   
      
   > To verify is to see for oneself what works and what doesn't. That is   
   > the experiement and yes, it should be conducted scientifically.   
      
   > Don't just agree or disagree, if you only do   
   > this you are not qualified to pass judgment. It's like a man who talks   
   > about what it's like in, say, India, without ever having gone there.   
      
   You are so far from getting my point that I tend to agree: further   
   discussion is pointless.   
      
   > Maybe you could support my trying to help others who are also   
   > sincerely attempting to learn. That would be great!   
      
   Why would I send people to fabricated teachings?   
      
   >   
   > You may have the agenda of shutting down my input to this discussion   
   > thread by arguing until i go away.   
      
   So, you're going to solve the problem of being made to "go away", by   
   going away?   
      
   Hilarious.   
      
   --   
   =======================================================================   
   = David    --- If you use Microsoft products, you will, inevitably, get   
   = Mitchell --- viruses, so please don't add me to your address book.   
   =======================================================================   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)