On Tuesday, September 17, 1996 at 12:00:00 AM UTC-7, Agamemnon wrote:   
   > Well, anyone who follows the Remote Viewing scene, or has any knowledge   
   > of Remote viewers, will know that the two most expensive institutes for   
   > learning this art belong to Courtney Brown, and Ed Dames.  Both have web   
   > sites (Farsight Institute and PSI 3000, respectively).  So check for   
   > them, if you're interested in that kind of thing.   
   >   
   >   Courtney Brown has reportedly sent two remote viewers to the site of   
   > TWA Flight 800, and one Professional Remote Viewer.  While none of them   
   > have correctly identified the mechanism for the destruction of TWA Flight   
   > 800, they have given a vague description of the person they feel was   
   > responsible for the crash.  If I were sending a Remote Viewer I would   
   > want to know "why" the plane went down, and the home address of the   
   > person responsible.  But I digress.   
   >   
   >   Ed Dames, of PSI 3000, and who claims to have been a Remote Viewer from   
   > the military, published a statement stating that it was not a missle, and   
   > it was not a bomb, but the result of a mechanical failure.  Seems like a   
   > pretty catastrophic failure to me, but who am I to judge.   
   >   
   >   There is the ever so slight chance that the person described on   
   > Courtney Brown's Farsight Institute web page, had something to do with the   
   > mechanical failure, but the preparation described by the Farsight team   
   > is incongruous with the report coming from PSI 3000.  Farsight reports   
   > the "dark person" "packing something."  They aren't sure if it was a   
   > missle or bomb, but they sense a foreign underworld.  Somehow this person   
   > was wronged by the government, they claim.   
   >   
   >   PSI 3000 claims a 100% success rate with all of the information it   
   > releases, where Courtney Brown has claimed an 85% rate with his   
   > information.  Someone must be wrong.  Remote Viewing shouldn't be able to   
   > give two different results.  Should it?   
   >   
   >   The decisions are in.  And the winner is . . .   
   >   
   > --   
   > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=   
   >   
   >          "I'm out of the loop.  And that's the way I like it."   
   >   
   > -=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-   
      
   Ed Dames goes by the book.  CRV is structured and linear.  Courtney Brown does   
   not follow the original CIA protocol   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)