f4b931bf   
   XPost: alt.alien.visitors, alt.astronomy   
   From: ya@da.com   
      
   On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 20:42:22 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Aug 9, 6:44 pm, V  wrote:   
   >> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 18:29:29 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>  wrote:   
   >> >On Aug 9, 5:19 pm, V  wrote:   
   >> >> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 14:29:59 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth   
   >>   
   >> >>  wrote:   
   >> >> >ETs,   
   >>   
   >> >> You can leave the extraterrestrials out of that broad brush you're   
   >> >> projecting on the Universe -- extraterrestrials don't like Nazis, aka   
   >> >> ZNRs.   
   >>   
   >> >> > like those Rothschild Seans that supposedly have been around for   
   >> >> >70 million years, are apparently slow trial and error learners, always   
   >> >> >in need of do-overs and never a speck of remorse because they don't   
   >> >> >have to live here.  Oops, that's almost exactly like our Zionists/Jews   
   >> >> >that still can't get it right, so instead they just keep pissing   
   >> >> >everyone off because they're so extra special.   
   >>   
   >> >> It's exceptionally odd that the Rothschild genetics appeared on Earth   
   >> >> many thousands of years after the original Earth inhabitants wherein   
   >> >> all genetic evidence is pointing to Siberia as home to Earth's   
   >> >> original inhabitants.   
   >>   
   >> >Those little Dropa/Dzopa folks seem to have their place way ahead of   
   >> >most of us, although Ed Conrad’s “man of coal” that’s supposedly at   
   >> >270 some odd million years old is right in there along with those   
   >> >dinosaurs that kicked the bucket shortly thereafter.   
   >>   
   >> I was speaking of the current crop of hominids which are currently   
   >> inhabiting Earth.  There is strong evidence that the original   
   >> aborigines of north, south America and the pacific were from Siberia.   
   >>   
   >> >Makes me think that perhaps several humanoid species were deployed   
   >> >here from time to time,   
   >>   
   >> We really don't have the archeological evidence to support that.   
   >> All of the findings point to once continuous race of hominoids, which   
   >> may have been genetically altered over time by either visiting   
   >> extraterrestrial civilizations, or more likely the current ET   
   >> civilization which has Earth under observation.   
   >Why would any ET care to observe us (other than for laughs)?   
      
   You're projecting again.  You can't know what it's like to belong to a   
   billion year old civilization which is vastly more technological and   
   advanced then you.   
      
   >>   
   >> > and not that this planet hadn’t evolved to   
   >> >having a few humanoid species of its own,   
   >>   
   >> Again, the archaeological and genetic evidence point to one   
   >> species of Earth hominids -- with sporadic genetic modifications.   
   >Too many gaps, weirdness and dysfunctionality.   
      
   Nope.  The genetics of past hominids is nearly identical to the   
   present.   
      
   > Humans are not suited   
   >to this small planet.  We humans amount to 1 ppm, and the other 999999   
   >ppm really doesn't need us.   
      
   It's doubtful you'd understand this, but the test on any sentient   
   species is if they can provide for their long term survival.  That's   
   easier said than done.   
   >   
   >>   
   >> > though I’d doubt they   
   >> >survived considering those pesky ice ages, subsequent global floods,   
   >> >sweltering tropics, extreme pestilence like hell on Earth, plus   
   >> >competing against those more advanced versions of humans that were   
   >> >sent here by whomever or via whatever happenstance.   
   >>   
   >> If you were trying to create a new species of sentient beings, how   
   >> precisely would you go about it?  Or more precisely, if you found   
   >> a new species of genetically created sentient beings which were ill   
   >> equipped to survive, what would you do?   
   >   
   >Intelligent design, or at least redesign.   
      
   And a Neanderthal looked at a rock and found it's design intelligent.   
      
   > For one thing there   
   >wouldn't be any need for a useless or dysfunctional human species like   
   >yourself.   
   >   
   >If you're anything like the rest of us, your physical/biological   
   >attributes are all wrong, or at best defective.   
      
   See above.  The only defective sentient beings are those who do not   
   and can not provide for their long term survival.  That's a sentient   
   beings goal, or should be.   
   >   
   >>   
   >> > Our solar system is roughly a third the age of this universe,   
   >>   
   >> Wrong.  Due the fact that the Universe is constantly recycling itself,   
   >> you have no way of EVER knowing how old the Universe is.   
   >   
   >I'll buy into that.  So, tell us how many hundred billion years old   
   >this universe actually is.   
      
   Inability to comprehend a clearly written explanation noted.   
      
   >>   
   >> >plenty of time for other advanced humanoid species as ETs to have   
   >> >evolved and taken a shot at exploring and utilizing Earth.  However,   
   >> >considering the greater mineral and energy value of Venus would tend   
   >> >to make Earth more of a rest stop or entertainment destination than   
   >> >anything else. (for one thing, ETs could play their war games and   
   >> >faith-based voodoo by using Earth)   
   >>   
   >> For the millionth time -- there's nothing on Earth that any billion   
   >> year old extraterrestrial civilization needs.   
   >   
   >That is correct, but how about Venus?   
      
   Same thing.   
      
      
   >   
   > ~ BG   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)