a4b6300d   
   XPost: alt.alien.visitors, alt.alien.research, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy   
   From: ttt_heg@web.de   
      
   Am 07.01.2012 03:14, schrieb Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A.:   
   ..   
   > Will it convince them? No! Their debunker's pre-subscribed dogma will   
   > not allow it. If all else fails, they will claim it is your   
   > responsibility as an investigator to respond to their demands. Don't   
   > fall for that ploy. Only you and the organization you represent can   
   > define your responsibilities.   
   >   
   > A formula for avoiding stress caused by the actions of the debunkers   
   > is to follow industry's lead in looking for "value added" in any   
   > interchange or effort. If there is nothing to be gained from   
   > responding to them, then don't do it. Apply your energies where they   
   > will make a difference. Don't play their game. It takes two to make a   
   > game and if you do not respond to their provocation, then they do not   
   > have a game. They lose and you are not stressed.   
      
      
   This is a statement belonging to 'corporate science', what is   
   contraindicative in itself.   
      
   Science is about 'finding truth' and about communication. The own group   
   does not define, what  science is and does not tell, what you aught to   
   do. This is so only in unscientific circumstances, we call 'business'.   
   In companies you do not follow scientific agendas, but want (or:  have   
   to) maximize to wealth of that company. But science has trouble with   
   'value added', because very often no value is added.   
      
   Actually knowledge is the wealth of science, but neither the group (or   
   its objectives) or simple money.   
      
      
   TH   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)