bdc7b765   
   XPost: alt.alien.visitors, alt.alien.research, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy   
   From: xxxxxx@charter.net   
      
   "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A."   
    wrote in message   
   news:a828d5ad-5072-4270-b87d-c476b80b7142@b10g2000pbd.googlegroups.com...   
   On Jan 21, 9:21 am, "The Patriot"    
   wrote:   
   > "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers   
   > A.S.A." wrote in message   
   >   
   > news:30174fa7-cf61-4bb4-84bc-bb1e48a90e7b@pt5g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...   
   > Privatizing the War on Terror: America’s Military   
   > Contractors   
   >   
   > >>>>> deletion <<<<<   
   >   
   > Request to start a private war is DENIED!!!   
      
   The spOOks-Kooks-Trolls (SKT) methods are easy to   
   decipher, they use   
   them repeatedly:   
      
   * They never address the good evidence in regards to   
   the ET reality.   
   They will never in any meaningful way discuss the good   
   scientific work   
   done on animal mutilations; crop circles and   
   pictographs, alien   
   abductions; trace cases-where the craft lands and   
   leaves; recovered   
   down craft; back engineering of alien craft; surgically   
   removed alien   
   implants, outstanding videos from NASA, etc.   
      
   * The SKT's will not argue the evidence, they will   
   attack the person   
   presenting the evidence. This is their top technique,   
   make the poster   
   the center-of-attention, and then follow up each   
   other's post with   
   more nonsense.  The Usenet Debunkers are like a pack of   
   hungry wolfs,   
   the first one makes a snide remark about the poster and   
   the others   
   follow suit.  Flame wars galore. DO NOT LET THIS   
   TECHNIQUE FOOL YOU,   
   there is real good information on these newsgroups!   
      
   Other distinguishing features of the   
   spOOks-KooKs-Trolls:   
      
   *Make comments unrelated to do with the subject matter.   
   *Have closed minds and can't be bothered by facts.   
   *Refuse to do a stitch of research on this topic.   
   *Never get within 50 feet of a witness or researcher.   
   *Attack any book on the topic (except those by the CIA   
   propriety   
   press: Prometheus).   
   *Supply gobs and gobs of mis- and dis-information.   
   *Claim there isn't a credible photo when there has been   
   hundreds if   
   not   
   thousands of them, as well as thousands of hours of   
   videos.   
   *Straw man attack.-they will fashion a dummy position   
   held by a UFO   
   researcher. Then proceed to rip it apart. Many will   
   discredit the   
   researcher on this false premise.   
   *Invoke authority.   
   *Dismiss the charges as "old news."   
   *Set the criteria for "proof" incredibly high so that   
   it could never   
   be reached.   
   *Always ignore the first-hand testimony of witnesses to   
   the unexpected   
   credible sightings.   
   *Practice scientific research by proclamation not   
   investigation.   
   ---------------------   
      
   *****************************************************   
   Holeflapper's request to practice scientific research   
   would be a farce.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)