6b0b48a7
From: phantasypublishing@gmail.com
On Sunday, December 23, 2012 3:42:58 AM UTC-6, Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffers ASA
wrote:
> Brian Zeiler, You're Doing A Great Service/ UFO Debunkers in Massive
>
> Retreat.
>
>
>
> Brian Zeiler, You're Doing A Great Service/ UFO Debunkers in Retreat.
>
>
>
> Brian, Let me extend a hearty thank-you from myself and from all the
>
> honest
>
> UFO researchers in your efforts to document and illuminate the well
>
> proven facts. The UFO community would also like to extend our
>
> gratitude for the work you have done in bringing new ideas and solid
>
> information to light. We are in your debt. Also, I would like to
>
> encourage you to keep up your investigations, for they are highly
>
> educational and written in a scholarly manner.
>
>
>
> Please don't be put off by those luckless charlatans posing as UFO
>
> debunkers.
>
> At best, we can say these impostors are ignorant dupes and fools,
>
> "useless idiots" if you will, at worst, they are intelligence
>
> community,
>
> low-level assets who can't make it in the real world.
>
> It is a pity they spend so much effort in the distortion and
>
> vandalism of good science. May history view them in higher regard
>
> than I do,
>
> they'll need it.
>
>
>
> From time to time, it is important for all of us to let you know the
>
> outstanding contributions you are making in the field and what a
>
> delight and
>
> inspiration it is to have you around. With your valuable assistance,
>
> I'm sure "our" side will win. The truth always does!
>
>
>
> Again, let me declare your efforts were remarkable in digging up the
>
> Ames and Sandia connections. That was impressive, and, of course,
>
> highly indicative of the lengths 'they' are going to in trying to
>
> control and
>
> cover-up the ET/Alien information. Bravo!
>
>
>
> BRIAN ZEILER RESPONDS:
>
>
>
>
>
> Brian Zeiler wrote on Oct. 19, 1996:
>
> Art Wholeflaffer wrote:
>
>
>
> > Brian, Let me extend a hearty thank-you from myself and from all the
honest
>
> > UFO researchers in your efforts to document and illuminate the well
>
> > proven facts.
>
>
>
> You're welcome, and thank you. And let's also not forget that I am
>
> too prone to
>
> getting suckered into flame wars with the self-styled "skeptics", and
>
> this noise
>
> tends to overshadow the very high quality posts from David Rudiak, J.
>
> Walter,
>
> Bill Peterson, and a few others whose contributions are appreciated.
>
>
>
> > Please don't be put off by those luckless charlatans posing as UFO
debunkers.
>
> > At best, we can say these impostors are ignorant dupes and fools,
>
> > useless "idiots" if you will, at worst, they are intelligence community,
>
> > low-level assets who can't make it in the real world.
>
>
>
> Sadly, the vast majority appear to be all too sincere. Rogers, Fun,
>
> McKnight
>
> (where's he been?), etc., are nothing more than typical dime-a-dozen
>
> skeptics who
>
> lease their opinions from their masters and overlords at CSICOP in a
>
> rather
>
> repugnant display of intellectual incompetence and lack of capacity
>
> for
>
> independent reasoning. Of course, that's due in no small part to the
>
> intellectual prostitution of Menzel and Sagan and other opinion
>
> leaders who duped
>
> generations of scientists into absorbing a culture of UFO ridicule and
>
> rejection
>
> with absolutely no logical basis whatsoever -- nothing but silly
>
> debunkeries that
>
> invariably collapse under scrutiny along with an idiot mantra about
>
> "extraordinariness" which presumes the inductive powers of probability
>
> estimation
>
> in the midst of insufficient data.
>
>
>
> It's absolutely staggering to see scientific leadership deteriorate to
>
> such a
>
> level of stagnancy and ambivalence in research effort, coupled with a
>
> total lack
>
> of exposure to the evidence *and* a blinding, foaming, raging need to
>
> disbelieve
>
> and debunk with the urgent zeal of a fanatical religious nut. That's
>
> the
>
> scientific treatment of the UFO evidence, all spawned by their blind
>
> devotion to
>
> their overlords and masters like Sagan and Menzel. Truly
>
> unbelievable.
>
>
>
> > It is a pity they spend so much effort in the
>
> > distortion and vandalism of good science. May history view
>
> > them in higher regard than I do, they'll need it.
>
>
>
> History will view them as fools -- relentless defenders of dogma,
>
> blind fools who
>
> crippled scientific progress in the name of, ironically, "science",
>
> which they
>
> fallaciously equate with skepticism, their need-to-disbelieve
>
> religion. History
>
> will show that they undermined that which they sought to defend --
>
> good science.
>
>
>
> It's truly sad to see human progress and potential reflected so feebly
>
> and
>
> pathetically in the scientific community's willful blindness to this
>
> discovery,
>
> especially in this age of such revolutionary technological progress.
>
> The failure
>
> of science in this aspect -- arguably the biggest aspect, the greatest
>
> discovery of all time -- will long be remembered as the pox on a
>
> century
>
> otherwise full of conquest and glory, the grandest 100 years of
>
> science that ever
>
> happened.
>
>
>
> The US government will release the goods, but probably not for a long
>
> time. When
>
> they do, the world will instantly view the "UFO skeptics" as a group
>
> of
>
> irrational zealots who, rather unfortunately, happened to be in
>
> positions of
>
> public influence.
>
>
>
> In the meantime, all we can do is observe the UFO skeptics and, with a
>
> necessary
>
> sense of humor that enables us to laugh raucously at their silly
>
> logic, watch
>
> them struggle to deny, disbelieve, and debunk. Hey, that'll be the
>
> three D's of
>
> modern science's treatment of the UFO evidence...
>
>
>
> --
>
> Brian Zeiler
show physical proof that is able to be investigated by multiple sources.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
